2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2004.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pharmacokinetics of marbofloxacin after single intravenous and repeat oral administration to cats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
1
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
19
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At 16°C, the bioavailability of enrofl oxacin was 66.13% in this study, which was higher than the 50.82% at 10°C and the profi les studied previously. The reported 50.82% or 66.13% bioavailability of enrofl oxacin was much lower than that of quinolones in domestic animals (Hu and Feng, 1999;Zeng et al, 2003;Albarellos et al, 2005;Dimitrova et al, 2006). However, other quinolones in turbot were reported with lower bioavailabilities than the bioavailability of enrofl oxacin, such as a 27.90% bioavailability of oxolinic acid after 10 mg/kg at 16°C, and a 59% bioavailability of fl umequine after oral administration at 10 mg/kg at 18°C (Poher, 1998;Hansen and Horsberg, 1999).…”
Section: The Comparative Pharmacokinetics Of Enrofl Oxacinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 16°C, the bioavailability of enrofl oxacin was 66.13% in this study, which was higher than the 50.82% at 10°C and the profi les studied previously. The reported 50.82% or 66.13% bioavailability of enrofl oxacin was much lower than that of quinolones in domestic animals (Hu and Feng, 1999;Zeng et al, 2003;Albarellos et al, 2005;Dimitrova et al, 2006). However, other quinolones in turbot were reported with lower bioavailabilities than the bioavailability of enrofl oxacin, such as a 27.90% bioavailability of oxolinic acid after 10 mg/kg at 16°C, and a 59% bioavailability of fl umequine after oral administration at 10 mg/kg at 18°C (Poher, 1998;Hansen and Horsberg, 1999).…”
Section: The Comparative Pharmacokinetics Of Enrofl Oxacinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 13% increase in AUC and AI = 1.13 ± 0.012 suggested lack of MBF accumulation after repeated IM administration up to 5 days. Similarly, MBF accumulation was not observed in cats after repeated oral administration for 6 days (Albarellos et al, ). However, after repeated IM administration, a slight accumulation of MBF had been observed in cattle (Schneider et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…There is an urgent need to set up PK/PD‐based rational dosage schedule of MBF to preserve its efficacy for treatment of infectious diseases. Pharmacokinetics of MBF were previously studied in cattle, horse, sheep, goats, poultry, turkey, dogs and cats following single dose administration (Albarellos, Montoya, & Landoni, ; Aliabadi & Lees, ; Anadon et al, ; Bousquet‐Melou, Bernard, Schneider, & Toutain, ; Regnier, Concordet, Schneider, Boisrame, & Toutain, ; Schneider et al, ; Sidhu et al, , , ; Waxman et al, ) but there is no PK/PD data following repeated MBF administration in goats. Hence, the data generated in this study provide a rational basis for determination of an optimal therapeutic dosage regimen of MBF following repeated administration to treat infectious diseases produced by E. coli and P. multocida in goats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following oral administration of marbofloxacin, the mean peak serum concentrations (C max ) were 1.15±0.01 g/mL accomplished at time (T max ) 2.53±0.04 h. Marbofloxacin could be distinguished in a therapeutic concentration for 24 h after oral administration. The pharmacokinetics parameters of marbofloxacin following a single intravenous and oral administration were recorded in table (1). Oral administration of 2 mg/kg.b.wt every 24 hours for five doses in normal and E.coli infected chicken uncovered a lower significant serum marbofloxacin concentration at all-time sampling in E.coli infected chicken than in normal ones.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%