The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/SIGDA 14th International Symposium on Field Programmable Gate Arrays 2006
DOI: 10.1145/1117201.1117219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Performance benefits of monolithically stacked 3D-FPGA

Abstract: Abstract-The performance benefits of a monolithically stacked three-dimensional (3-D) field-programmable gate array (FPGA), whereby the programming overhead of an FPGA is stacked on top of a standard CMOS layer containing logic blocks (LBs) and interconnects, are investigated. A Virtex-II-style two-dimensional (2-D) FPGA fabric is used as a baseline architecture to quantify the relative improvements in logic density, delay, and power consumption achieved by such a 3-D FPGA. It is assumed that only the switch t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(20 reference statements)
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lin et al [8] introduced a monolithically stacked 3D FPGA with separate layers for logic, routing, and configuration bits; unlike our work, their proposal was not a multi-context FPGA.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lin et al [8] introduced a monolithically stacked 3D FPGA with separate layers for logic, routing, and configuration bits; unlike our work, their proposal was not a multi-context FPGA.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…3. We can calculate the area of the tile width in comparison to pitch and copper bond size: pitch_width = bond_width + spacing_width (8) tile_width = 3 × bond_width + 2 × spacing_width (9) tile_height = 3 × bond_width + 2 × spacing_width (10) A tile = tile_width × tile_height (11) We make the following simplifying assumptions: bond_width = bond_height (12) spacing_width = spacing_height (13) num_horizontal_bonds = num_vertical_bonds (14) From these assumptions, we can replace Eq. (11) with (15) …”
Section: Morrow Et Al's [12]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of the parameters are from [4] and [30]. Fig.14(a) shows the package model assuming a face-toback stacking.…”
Section: System Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3DMI technology promises very small 3D contacts in the order of a few 100nm [Jung et al 2007], thereby enabling circuit partitioning at a fine granularity. Few publications proposed 3D FPGA architecture employing 3DMI technology Lin et al 2007]. The authors proposed to partition the blocks with the SRAM cells (used for configuration) in one layer and the logic part on the other layer.…”
Section: Previous Work In 3d Monolithic Integrated Circuitsmentioning
confidence: 99%