2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.image.2014.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Perceptual quality assessment of 3D dynamic meshes: Subjective and objective studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In about the last decade, however, new approaches were proposed that provide results of better visual appeal [SCOT03, VP04], yet worse quality in terms of the traditional error metrics. This discrepancy has motivated several user studies focused on mesh distortion perception [Lav09, TWC15], which in turn lead to proposal of multiple error metrics [Lav11, TWC14] that provide vastly improved correlation with the user study results.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In about the last decade, however, new approaches were proposed that provide results of better visual appeal [SCOT03, VP04], yet worse quality in terms of the traditional error metrics. This discrepancy has motivated several user studies focused on mesh distortion perception [Lav09, TWC15], which in turn lead to proposal of multiple error metrics [Lav11, TWC14] that provide vastly improved correlation with the user study results.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, security in computer science is based on objective indicators that supply a level of security. Subjective measures are used in fields of computer visualizations (Torkhani et al 2015). They make sense when data is difficult to obtain; when the associated concepts are difficult to measure, e.g.…”
Section: Measuring Security In Cloud Storagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypotenuse of the spatial and temporal components then gives the STED error. Another attempt for perceptual quality evaluation of dynamic meshes is by Torkhani et al [45]. Their metric is a weighted mean square combination of three distances: speed-weighted spatial distortion measure, vertex speed-related contrast, and vertex moving direction related contrast.…”
Section: Model-based Perceptual Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perceptual error metrics designed for dynamic meshes to date that we are aware of are [46] and [45]. However, dynamic mesh datasets of [46] and [45] provide only one frame per animation and this is not sufficient for our metric to be applied on these datasets.…”
Section: Comparison To Star Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation