2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13640-016-0157-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A perceptual quality metric for dynamic triangle meshes

Abstract: A measure for assessing the quality of a 3D mesh is necessary in order to determine whether an operation on the mesh, such as watermarking or compression, affects the perceived quality. The studies on this field are limited when compared to the studies for 2D. In this work, we aim a full-reference perceptual quality metric for animated meshes to predict the visibility of local distortions on the mesh surface. The proposed visual quality metric is independent of connectivity and material attributes. Thus, it is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Roughness infers the geometric non-smoothness [ 63 ] of a surface and can be computed as either a local or a global property: while local roughness may provide the high frequency behavior of the mesh vertices in a local region, global roughness is an indication of the average low frequency surface characteristic [ 64 ]. Curvature is also adopted as a measure to indicate structure and noise, well correlating with visual experience [ 65 ]. Databases comprising reference and distorted meshes are publicly available for assessing MVQ degradation introduced by geometrical processing [ 66 ] (subjective quality assessment of 3D models).…”
Section: Benchmarks and Assessment Of Surface Reconstruction Appromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roughness infers the geometric non-smoothness [ 63 ] of a surface and can be computed as either a local or a global property: while local roughness may provide the high frequency behavior of the mesh vertices in a local region, global roughness is an indication of the average low frequency surface characteristic [ 64 ]. Curvature is also adopted as a measure to indicate structure and noise, well correlating with visual experience [ 65 ]. Databases comprising reference and distorted meshes are publicly available for assessing MVQ degradation introduced by geometrical processing [ 66 ] (subjective quality assessment of 3D models).…”
Section: Benchmarks and Assessment Of Surface Reconstruction Appromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Torkhani et al [43] devised a quality metric for dynamic meshes, which is a combination of spatial and temporal features. In more recent work, Yildiz et al [114] developed a bottom-up approach incorporating both the spatial and temporal sensitivity of the HVS to predict the visibility of local distortions on the mesh surface.…”
Section: For Meshesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These types of artifacts are already proved and experimented by several researchers which are already discussed in the previous section. In [40], a marking tool and marking system of subjective responses on distorted areas are described clearly, shown in Fig. 3.…”
Section: A Subjective Score and Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a) Evaluation Screen b) Top-left: reference mesh, top-right: modified mesh, bottom-left: mean subjective response, bottom-right: estimated visual response. From[40]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%