EuroSimE 2005. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Thermal, Mechanial and Multi-Physics Simulation and Experimen
DOI: 10.1109/esime.2005.1502871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peaks in temperature wstribution over the area of operating power semiconductor junctions related to the surface leakage current

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [3], it is shown that the Lorentz temperature distribution allows for the estimation of the temperature within a substrate using some parameters of a power electronic device and a 3D temperature distribution of the substrate. According to [4], junction temperature distribution is not uniform, the heat transfer to the heatsink being significantly higher on the junction periphery than the heat eliminated from the junction bulk. Junction temperature control solutions for power semiconductor devices are usually depend on a specific task or profile, and the controller has to be adjusted to assure the desired performances [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [3], it is shown that the Lorentz temperature distribution allows for the estimation of the temperature within a substrate using some parameters of a power electronic device and a 3D temperature distribution of the substrate. According to [4], junction temperature distribution is not uniform, the heat transfer to the heatsink being significantly higher on the junction periphery than the heat eliminated from the junction bulk. Junction temperature control solutions for power semiconductor devices are usually depend on a specific task or profile, and the controller has to be adjusted to assure the desired performances [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless above 1000-1200 V, deviation from approximately a linear dependence of I R is visible as in the case of the (R) diode. Further investigation, [7], indicates that such behaviour may be attributed to the surface component I RS which above 1000 -1200 V becomes comparable and even higher than the bulk component I RB . Attempts of operation of the (F) diode for short time at a current level of 10 mA leads to similar junction failure behaviour as described above for the similar (R) diode.…”
Section: Experimental Results Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The component I RAS at high I RA level, is significant lower than the bulk component, I RAB , uniformly distributed over the junction area. Nonetheless, at lower I RA level, the two components I RAS and I RAB become comparable and overheating at the junction periphery is possible, [7], because the power dissipation corresponding to I RAS is concentrated in a much smaller volume than I RAB. The component I RAS of the avalanche current may be even more non-uniformly distributed on the junction perimeter than the component I RS of the saturation current .…”
Section: Experimental Results Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%