2010
DOI: 10.1097/hmr.0b013e3181d5b0f5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Partnership effectiveness in primary community care networks

Abstract: Using the individual PCCN as the unit of analysis, the results found that a network's efforts regarding coordination infrastructures were positively related to the PCCN's perceived performance and willingness to remain within the network. In addition, PCCNs practicing in rural areas and in areas with higher density of medical resources had better perceived effectiveness and willingness to cooperate in the network.Practical Implication: The lack of both an operational definition and an information about system-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS software, version 7.0) (Arbuckle, 2006) was used. Because the χ 2 statistic for model fit is highly sensitive to sample size, we employed several statistics to assess model fitness (Shook et al, 2004): (a) Root Mean Square Error Approximation (RMSEA): 0 = an exact fit, <0.05 = a close fit, 0.05–0.08 = a fair fit, 0.08–0.10 = a mediocre fit, and >0.10 = a poor fit (AMOS also computes a 90% confidence interval around RMSEA); (b) Comparative Fit Index (CFI): best if above 0.90; (c) Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). For model comparisons, smaller values in AIC represent a better fit of the model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of Moment Structures (AMOS software, version 7.0) (Arbuckle, 2006) was used. Because the χ 2 statistic for model fit is highly sensitive to sample size, we employed several statistics to assess model fitness (Shook et al, 2004): (a) Root Mean Square Error Approximation (RMSEA): 0 = an exact fit, <0.05 = a close fit, 0.05–0.08 = a fair fit, 0.08–0.10 = a mediocre fit, and >0.10 = a poor fit (AMOS also computes a 90% confidence interval around RMSEA); (b) Comparative Fit Index (CFI): best if above 0.90; (c) Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). For model comparisons, smaller values in AIC represent a better fit of the model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%