1991
DOI: 10.1080/09349849109409499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Particle Sizing by Quantitative Acoustic Emission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these, PZ sensors are the most sensitive [30], making them particularly useful to detect low momentum-transfer impacts. Ball-rod [18], [27] and ball-plate [7], [8], [9], [10], [19], [31], [32], [33] experiments involving the detection of ballimpact-induced elastic waves were realized. Long-enough rods allow the elimination of the disturbance caused by the wave reflections.…”
Section: Contact Time Measuring Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Of these, PZ sensors are the most sensitive [30], making them particularly useful to detect low momentum-transfer impacts. Ball-rod [18], [27] and ball-plate [7], [8], [9], [10], [19], [31], [32], [33] experiments involving the detection of ballimpact-induced elastic waves were realized. Long-enough rods allow the elimination of the disturbance caused by the wave reflections.…”
Section: Contact Time Measuring Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the methods described above were used for ball diameters larger than about 10 mm, which are capable of producing impacts with contact times in the 100 µs range. For impacts involving balls with diameters as small as 35 µm [8], PZ detection of elastic waves seems to be the only alternative due to unmatched sensitivity of this detection technique. McLaskey and Glaser experimented with glass, ruby and hardened steel balls 0.4 mm to 2.5 mm in diameter.…”
Section: Contact Time Measuring Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations