2013
DOI: 10.1080/09500340.2013.825336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parametric semi-blind deconvolution algorithm with Huber–Markov regularization for passive millimeter-wave images

Abstract: 2013) Parametric semi-blind deconvolution algorithm with Huber-Markov regularization for passive millimeter-wave images, Journal of Modern Optics, 60:12, 970-982, Passive millimeter-wave (PMMW) images often suffer common problems of noise and blurring. A new method is proposed to estimate the instrument response function (IRF) and desired image simultaneously. The proposed variational model integrates the adaptive weight data term, image smooth term, and IRF smooth term. The major novelty of this work is that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, due to the ill-posed nature of deconvolution, the RL algorithm will amplify the noise with increasing iteration number. Thus, many regularizations such as Tikhonov regularization (TR) [9][10][11], shape priori [12], high-order statistics (HOS), Huber-Markov [13,14], and spatial regularization [15] have been incorporated. In recent years, total variation (TV) and its variants have been popular choices for the regularization terms to solve various blind deconvolution problems [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the ill-posed nature of deconvolution, the RL algorithm will amplify the noise with increasing iteration number. Thus, many regularizations such as Tikhonov regularization (TR) [9][10][11], shape priori [12], high-order statistics (HOS), Huber-Markov [13,14], and spatial regularization [15] have been incorporated. In recent years, total variation (TV) and its variants have been popular choices for the regularization terms to solve various blind deconvolution problems [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%