Page Navigation on Paper Books and Electronic Media in Reading to Answer Questions

Shibata, Hirohito; Takano, Kentaro; Omura, Kengo; Tano, Shun’ichi

doi:10.1145/2838739.2838747

Cited by 9 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We include these findings because typical information retrieval research focuses on text [7], but there has been some evidence that visual material (e.g. images) attracts reader attention [53]. All participants used more than one type of information.…”

Section: Information Typesmentioning

confidence: 99%

We are the Change that we Seek

McKay

Makri

Lopez

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There has been considerable hype about filter bubbles and echo chambers influencing the views of information consumers. The fear is that these technologies are undermining democracy by swaying opinion and creating an uninformed, polarised populace. The literature in this space is mostly techno-centric, addressing the impact of technology. In contrast, our work is the first research in the information interaction field to examine changing viewpoints from a human-centric perspective. It provides a new understanding of view change and how we might support informed, autonomous view change behaviour. We interviewed 18 participants about a self-identified change of view, and the information touchpoints they engaged with along the way. In this paper we present the information types and sources that informed changes of viewpoint, and the ways in which our participants interacted with that information. We describe our findings in the context of the techno-centric literature and suggest principles for designing digital information environments that support user autonomy and reflection in viewpoint formation. CCS CONCEPTS• Information systems~Users and interactive retrieval • Humancentered computing~Empirical studies in HCI • Information systems~Retrieval tasks and goals

show abstract

Section: Information Typesmentioning

confidence: 99%

We are the Change that we Seek

McKay

Makri

Lopez

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A number of experiments have been conducted to evaluate these devices, but they evaluated the devices during reading for leisure such as reading novels or magazines [1][2][3][4]. Few studies have been evaluated the effectiveness of reading devices in work-related reading except for several analyses of reading to answer questions [5] and reading for discussion [6]. Recently some reading devices have been used in office work.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

6.4: Invited Paper: Impact of the Use of a Touch‐based Digital Reading Device in Immersive Reading

Shibata

Takano

Omura

2013

Symp Digest of Tech Papers

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper describes experiments to evaluate the impact of the use of a touch‐based digital reading device in immersive reading. The first experiment compared the performance of proofreading between that using paper documents and that using a touch‐based reading device. Results showed that participants detected more errors when reading from paper than when reading from the digital device. During reading, participants interacted with text such as pointing to words or brushing over sentences more frequently when reading from paper than when reading from the digital device. This suggests that interaction with text plays an important role in proofreading tasks. To verify this hypothesis, in the second experiment, participants proofread documents with constrained interaction with paper. Results showed that participants detected more errors when reading with text interaction than when reading without text interaction. Considering these results, we discuss practical implications to improve the usability of digital reading devices.

show abstract

“…People can turn pages using two hands with tactile feedback as well as audio and visual feedbacks and this enables quick and flexible page turning. In reading to answer questions from a text manual, participants were able to find answers more quickly when using paper books than when using a tablet PC and a desktop PC [7]. When accessing a certain section from a table of contents, they were able to return to the table of contents in no time because they inserted their finger in this page.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Paper Book Type Input Device for Page Navigation in Digital Documents

Masunaga

Terabe

et al. 2017

IEICE Trans. Electron.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYThis paper aims to support quick and easy page access in digital documents. We tried to use a paper book as a device to navigate pages for digital documents. Our proposed system allows the users to perform the same interaction as a paper book such as inserting fingers among pages or folding an edge of the page as a dog-ear. Three experiments were conducted to confirm the effectiveness of the proposed system. As a result, we confirmed our proposed system was superior to conventional navigation methods especially in moving back and forth among pages.

show abstract

Page Navigation on Paper Books and Electronic Media in Reading to Answer Questions

Cited by 9 publications

References 28 publications

We are the Change that we Seek

We are the Change that we Seek

6.4: Invited Paper: Impact of the Use of a Touch‐based Digital Reading Device in Immersive Reading

A Paper Book Type Input Device for Page Navigation in Digital Documents

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About