2020
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-6992-202035020002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Os poderes dos seguranças particulares no policiamento das propriedades privadas de massa

Abstract: Resumo A segunda metade do século XX testemunhou uma mudança importante na organização do espaço urbano e do controle social formal. Parte das interações sociais que antes ocorriam em espaços públicos policiados pela polícia deslocaram-se para propriedades privadas de massa policiadas por forças de segurança privada. Diante dessa realidade, o artigo analisa os fundamentos e os limites de alguns dos poderes legais mais usados no policiamento dos usuários dessas propriedades: as obstruções de entrada, as expulsõ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Not surprisingly, the debate on private security in Brazil focuses on discussions about the political system, as the emergence of private security is often framed as a direct consequence of failed public security and a broken judicial system (Caldeira, 2000). The pervasive presence of private security and technological surveillance is seen as an extension of violence and lack of state regulation (Firmino et al, 2013;Huggins, 2010;Lopes 2014;2017) and excessive use of force by guards (Lopes, 2020). Private security thus is most often examined through an absence prism, as insecurity, as violence, as unregulated action (Abrahamsen;Leander, 2016;Kim et al, 2018).…”
Section: Theorizing Hospitality Security In the Brazilian Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not surprisingly, the debate on private security in Brazil focuses on discussions about the political system, as the emergence of private security is often framed as a direct consequence of failed public security and a broken judicial system (Caldeira, 2000). The pervasive presence of private security and technological surveillance is seen as an extension of violence and lack of state regulation (Firmino et al, 2013;Huggins, 2010;Lopes 2014;2017) and excessive use of force by guards (Lopes, 2020). Private security thus is most often examined through an absence prism, as insecurity, as violence, as unregulated action (Abrahamsen;Leander, 2016;Kim et al, 2018).…”
Section: Theorizing Hospitality Security In the Brazilian Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%