2010
DOI: 10.5399/osu/1157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oregon climate assessment report : December 2010

Abstract: The group of scientists that make up the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change found in 2007 that the warming of Earth’s climate is unequivocal and largely due to human activity. Earth’s climate has changed in the past, though the recent magnitude and pace of changes are unprecedented in human existence. Recent decades have been warmer than at any time in roughly 120,000 years. Most of this warming can be attributed to anthropogenic activity, primarily burning fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas) for e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 590 publications
(857 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should also be noted that in our statewide models, the positive effects of winter wave height and upwelling were absent in the 1984–2018 model but emerged in the more recent 1996–2018 model. This suggests that these factors may have become more important in controlling Nereocystis populations in recent years, and is particularly interesting considering that upwelling and wave height have been increasing in Oregon under climate change (Dello and Mote 2010, Ruggiero et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should also be noted that in our statewide models, the positive effects of winter wave height and upwelling were absent in the 1984–2018 model but emerged in the more recent 1996–2018 model. This suggests that these factors may have become more important in controlling Nereocystis populations in recent years, and is particularly interesting considering that upwelling and wave height have been increasing in Oregon under climate change (Dello and Mote 2010, Ruggiero et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of businesses and homes in the resort community of Detroit also were destroyed when the Lions Head Fire swept through east Marion County (Paul 2020). As noted in previous Oregon Climate Assessments (Dello and Mote 2010, Dalton et al 2013, multiple respiratory and other health complications from wildfire smoke disproportionately harm frontline workers, low-income communities, the elderly, people with disabilities, and others with pre-existing conditions, such as asthma (see also Public Health, this volume). Data integration and analysis from the U.S. Census Bureau and U.S. Forest Service suggested that nationwide, communities of color and people currently living in poverty are more likely to live in census tracts with the highest likelihood of experiencing a wildfire event (Davies et al 2018).…”
Section: Public Healthmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Steven J. Dundas, Susan Capalbo, and James Sterns Assessments of the economic impacts of a changing climate on key sectors in Oregon and the Pacific Northwest have been included in previous Oregon Climate Assessments (Dello and Mote 2010;Dalton et al 2013Mote et al 2019;. The first and second Oregon Climate Assessments provided in-depth overviews of the methods and approaches used to value these impacts and the challenges and opportunities to designing policies to enhance mitigation and adaptation.…”
Section: The Economic Implications Of Climate Change For Oregonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oregon's economy and gross domestic product (GDP) remain highly impacted by the changing climate (e.g., increases in temperature, increased variation in the timing and intensity of precipitation). As noted in the first Oregon Climate Assessment (Dello and Mote 2010), it is nearly impossible to provide a comprehensive economic assessment of the effects of climate change on Oregon due to the breadth and diversity of Oregon's natural-resource based economy; the complexity of the interactions among sectors, climate variables, and climate-related variables; and limited empirical assessments in key areas, such as public health, migration, and sector-specific agricultural markets. Prior Oregon Climate Assessments also emphasized that many assessments have sidestepped the issue of behavioral responses and instead projected economic impacts under business-as-usual scenarios.…”
Section: Two Decades Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%