2014
DOI: 10.1097/01.aoa.0000455591.12104.93
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oral Nifedipine or Intravenous Labetalol for Hypertensive Emergency in Pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In studies done by Raheem et al, Shekhar et al and Swapan et al the percentage of vaginal delivery and caesarean section in IV Labetalol group was 48% and 52%, 66.6% and 33.3%, 54% and 46% while in oral Nifedipine 36% and 64%, 56.6% and 43.3%, 46% and 54% respectively. [14][15][16] In this study and in Shekhar et al, caesarean section rates were low, which may be due to better management by antihypertensive agents and low dose of Nifedipine required as it has tocolytic effect in large dose. Table 9 shows Hyperbilirubinemia were 5% and 2.5% in the Labetalol group and Nifedipine group respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In studies done by Raheem et al, Shekhar et al and Swapan et al the percentage of vaginal delivery and caesarean section in IV Labetalol group was 48% and 52%, 66.6% and 33.3%, 54% and 46% while in oral Nifedipine 36% and 64%, 56.6% and 43.3%, 46% and 54% respectively. [14][15][16] In this study and in Shekhar et al, caesarean section rates were low, which may be due to better management by antihypertensive agents and low dose of Nifedipine required as it has tocolytic effect in large dose. Table 9 shows Hyperbilirubinemia were 5% and 2.5% in the Labetalol group and Nifedipine group respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In following studies conducted the maternal mean age in both the group in Shekhar et al was 25.9 years, Swapan et al was 25.4 years while in Raheem et al was 31.4 years as the distribution of age was from 20 to 40 years, and sample size was less (n=50) ( Table 1). [14][15][16] 14,16 Hence time required to control raised blood pressure is less with oral Nifedipine as compared with IV Labetalol. Table 8 shows mode of delivery of the two groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies compared hydralazine with the labetolol and nifedipine with the labetolol found all three are equally effective in controlling hypertension. 11,12 But the cost of nifedipine is 1/25 th and 1/40 th times that of labetolol and hydralazine. So nifedipine can be a good alternative in low resource country like India over the other drugs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El nifedipino, un vasodilatador periférico antagonista de los canales lentos de calcio; recomendado en pacientes con sobrecarga de volumen, por aumento de la perfusión renal y en la diuresis, de acción rápida e indicado en el manejo de crisis hipertensivas y de mantenimiento, puede producir taquicardia, cefalea y enrojecimiento facial, su combinación con sulfato de magnesio debe estar vigilado por el riesgo de bloqueo neuromuscular (17)(18)(19)(20). Con respecto al uso en la lactancia materna se considera de riesgo muy bajo (nivel 0), se excreta en cantidades no significativas, no se ha observado alteraciones en los lactantes, ni tampoco altera la composición de la leche materna (16), de la misma manera la academia americana de pediatría lo toma como un medicamento compatible con la lactancia (21).…”
Section: Calcioantagonistasunclassified