Optimizing inkjet printing process to fabricate thick ceramic coatings

Rahul, S.; Kandasubramanian, Balasubramanian; Venkatesh, Sriram

doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.12.103

Cited by 21 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 18 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition to materials and structural optimization, the process parameters should be adjusted and optimized to manufacture scaffolds with desired attributes. Numerous studies investigated the effect of process parameters on different responses such as mechanical properties (strength, elongation, Young’s modulus), surface roughness, resolution and dimensional accuracy, and printing quality in different techniques including SLA [ 221 – 224 ], SLS [ 225 – 234 ], EBM [ 235 – 241 ], LENS [ 242 , 243 ], SLM [ 39 , 244 – 250 ], 2PP [ 251 – 253 ], FDM [ 254 – 256 ], MJ [ 257 , 258 ], AJP [ 259 – 262 ], and IJP [ 263 – 266 ]. There are many parameters in the 3D printing approaches which vary between different techniques as their machine structure, printing mechanisms, and materials used are rather different.…”

Section: D Printing Of Bone Scaffold Based On Cad Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among the studies on process parameters, some have used systematical methodologies including DOE and response surface methodology (RSM) such as Taguchi, two-level factorial, Box–Behnken, and central composite designs [ 221 , 222 , 228 , 230 , 234 , 244 , 245 , 247 , 253 – 255 , 260 , 263 , 266 ]. A response surface methodology is an optimization approach and a collection of statistical and mathematical approaches utilized to accomplish the multi-objective optimization procedure in various systems including materials, geometry and process.…”

Section: D Printing Of Bone Scaffold Based On Cad Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Challenges on optimization of 3D-printed bone scaffolds

Bahraminasab

2020

BioMed Eng OnLine

145

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Bones in human body are prone to damage due to different causes such as fractures, diseases, and infections. Nevertheless, they have a remarkable capacity to repair and heal themselves after trauma and illness. Large defects, however, are never completely reinstated because their sizes are beyond the limit up to which the bones can repair [1]. In these conditions, therefore, a medical remedy is required to stabilize, align and support the damaged bone region to restore the lost function. Bone autografts are considered the gold standard treatment. However, they have a number of shortcomings including the limited sources and donor site morbidity. Allografts also have the risk of immune rejection and disease transmission [2, 3]. Therefore, the research has headed for other solutions via tissue engineering. Bone tissue engineering provides three-dimensional (3D)

show abstract

Section: D Printing Of Bone Scaffold Based On Cad Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: D Printing Of Bone Scaffold Based On Cad Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Challenges on optimization of 3D-printed bone scaffolds

Bahraminasab

2020

BioMed Eng OnLine

145

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Research studies have been carried out on inkjet deposition of functional coatings in ceramics [33][34][35], electronics/conductive structures [36][37][38], energy storage devices [39,40], sensors [41][42][43], and biological membranes [44][45][46]. Drop-on-Demand based printers have been used for the fabrication of functional layers in SOFC manufacturing [24,[47][48][49][50].…”

Section: Different Coating Techniques Can Be Broadly Classified As Vamentioning

confidence: 99%

Formulation of spinel based inkjet inks for protective layer coatings in SOFC interconnects

Pandiyan

Steinberger‐Wilckens

2020

Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Link to publication on Research at Birmingham portal General rights Unless a licence is specified above, all rights (including copyright and moral rights) in this document are retained by the authors and/or the copyright holders. The express permission of the copyright holder must be obtained for any use of this material other than for purposes permitted by law. • Users may freely distribute the URL that is used to identify this publication. • Users may download and/or print one copy of the publication from the University of Birmingham research portal for the purpose of private study or non-commercial research. • User may use extracts from the document in line with the concept of 'fair dealing' under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (?) • Users may not further distribute the material nor use it for the purposes of commercial gain. Where a licence is displayed above, please note the terms and conditions of the licence govern your use of this document. When citing, please reference the published version. Take down policy While the University of Birmingham exercises care and attention in making items available there are rare occasions when an item has been uploaded in error or has been deemed to be commercially or otherwise sensitive.

show abstract

“…The application method is properly used solid binders and pigments [6][7][8][9]. Standardly, there typically have two standard types of powder coating, namely thermoplastic and thermosetting powders [10][11][12][13][14]. The empirical research on the continuous optimization of the powder coating process has not been done much.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Optimization of powder coating process parameters in mild steel (SPCC-SD) to improve dry film thickness

Sukarman¹,

Shieddieque²,

Anwar³

et al. 2021

J Appl Eng Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study presents a comprehensive review of the improved optimization for powder coating process variables in mild steel (SPCC-SD). The effective thickness of the dry film thickness (DFT) keeps a significant influence on the critical protection of mild steel against rust. In the powder coating process, the variable thickness is one of the primary and difficult objectives to accurately control the desired consistency. This empirical study properly uses RAL 7040 epoxy-polyester with the required thickness between 70-100 microns. This empirical study aims to reasonably achieve the optimal value of the effective thickness of the powder layer from specific combinations of specified process criteria. Practical experiments were properly conducted out manipulating an orthogonal Taguchi L16 array of independent variables; program, distance, application method, and the number of layers. This optimization method has been successfully upgraded. The average thickness of the powder coating layers reaches 84.85 microns. For a given limit, the application-method of typically preventing the determined cause correctly examined efficiently provides the most significant effect on effective thickness with an S/N ratio of 0.91. In the future, the relevant research may use our corresponding results to improve the powder coating procedure for other significant impacts.

show abstract

Optimizing inkjet printing process to fabricate thick ceramic coatings

Cited by 21 publications

References 18 publications

Challenges on optimization of 3D-printed bone scaffolds

Challenges on optimization of 3D-printed bone scaffolds

Formulation of spinel based inkjet inks for protective layer coatings in SOFC interconnects

Optimization of powder coating process parameters in mild steel (SPCC-SD) to improve dry film thickness

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About