1998
DOI: 10.1051/analusis:199826070046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimization and comparison of different modes of preparative chromatography

Abstract: List of symbols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prediction of the behavior of affinity systems during the washing and desorption stage requires the knowledge of the effective dissociation constant (K d ) which reflects the strength of the ligand-sorbate binding. Thus, the kinetic data is the basis for the evaluation of a new affinity medium [7] as well as for the modelling and optimization of the sorptive bioseparation processes [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction of the behavior of affinity systems during the washing and desorption stage requires the knowledge of the effective dissociation constant (K d ) which reflects the strength of the ligand-sorbate binding. Thus, the kinetic data is the basis for the evaluation of a new affinity medium [7] as well as for the modelling and optimization of the sorptive bioseparation processes [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A systematic investigation (theoretical simulation on the basis of determined adsorption isotherms and experimental verification) to compare the different chromatographic modes has recently been published by Seidel-Morgenstern for the separation of a binary mixture consisting of two isomers of a steroid [41,42]. The concentrations of component i in the liquid and in the solid phases, C i and q i , respectively, are related through the adsorption isotherms [equation ].…”
Section: Adsorption Isotherms and Their Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several methods (e.g., frontal analysis, elution by characteristic point, minor disturbance method, adsorption-desorption, and chromatogram fitting) are available for the determination of the equilibrium data and have been reviewed by Nicoud and Seidel-Morgenstern [43] and very recently by Seidel-Morgenstern [44]. It is beyond the scope of this chapter to describe all methods with their benefits and drawbacks in detail, and the interested reader is referred to the literature [i.e., [39][40][41][42][43][44]. Nevertheless, three methods (given below) that we have used in our laboratories are briefly summarized to illustrated the underlying principles.…”
Section: (21-3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] Recently, computer programmes have been used for the economic and operational optimization of HPLC at large scale. [8][9][10][11] Experimental cases of scale-up for peptides and proteins-based samples using models have been published. [12][13][14] However, for low molecular weight compounds, computerassisted prediction has only been used for the separation of binary aromatic chemicals and chiral isomers ( Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct scale-up of semi-preparative separation of natural compounds, 180 Mazzei and d'Avila ©2002 Marcel Dekker, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be used or reproduced in any form without the express written permission of Marcel Dekker, Inc. Non-ideal rate [11] a Also using direct scale-up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%