2018
DOI: 10.17775/cseejpes.2018.00030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal energy flow and nodal energy pricing in carbon emission-embedded integrated energy systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, gas flow equation in (4) and pressure drop equation in (12), which are nonlinear and nonconvex could, respectively, be reexpressed as (16) and (17) that look like linear equations in form. Sign function sgn( i , j ) is not required in the new formulation and thus is conducive to avoiding nonconvexity difficulty.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, gas flow equation in (4) and pressure drop equation in (12), which are nonlinear and nonconvex could, respectively, be reexpressed as (16) and (17) that look like linear equations in form. Sign function sgn( i , j ) is not required in the new formulation and thus is conducive to avoiding nonconvexity difficulty.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimality of natural gas system was not considered. In previous studies, [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] detailed network topologies and physical characteristics of both electric power system and natural gas systems were modeled equally in a unified modeling framework of the EGIES. Strictly speaking, electric power system should be completely formulated by the accurate alternating current (AC) power flow model 19 while natural gas system should be formulated by the accurate hydraulic model that mainly includes gas flow equation, compressor horsepower equation, and mass flow conservation equation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Most of the optimization objectives of IES are to minimize the total operating cost of the system or maximize social welfare [36][37][38][39]. (2) ere are also some studies whose optimization objectives are optimal carbon emissions or environmental bene ts, to achieve the proportion of green energy in the operation of IES system [40][41][42]. ere are still a few studies whose optimization objective is maximal absorption of renewable energy, to improve the proportion of energy supply from renewable energy in IES, so as to achieve better environmental bene ts [43].…”
Section: Optimization Objectives Of Iesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional environmental and economic planning is planned under the operational constraints of power systems, while a MEG contains multi-energy coupled gas units such as combined heat and power (CHP) and gas-fired boiler (GB) units, which need to be recalculated in the planning. In [16], the multi-period optimal energy flow of a carbon emission embedded neutralization energy system is studied. In [17], multiobjective optimization of a multi-energy network is proposed to jointly optimize the total operating cost and the total emissions generated by the network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to maximize the use of the economic and environmental advantages of the integrated energy system, a large-scale integrated energy system (IES) optimal energy flow model that considers the carbon trading market is proposed in [18], and three decentralized algorithms are used to deal with limited information exchange. However, in [15][16][17][18], most of the environmental benefits are calculated by using a penalty function or environmental cost. The environmental cost is smaller than the planning cost, which is negligible in multi-objective planning, causing planning errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%