2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3991(02)00140-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical interference artifacts in contact atomic force microscopy images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gunning et al46 were able to image larger micrometer‐sized oil (tetradecane) droplets in water on a polystyrene (PS) surface. While at low magnification the liquid surface appeared featureless, a close‐up look showed the presence of concentric rings (Figure 5a), which were suggested to be caused by an optical interference effect, as we had previously described for these kinds of round‐shaped objects having topographical contrast in the micrometer range 47. Finally, Tongcher et al48 have reported that stable liquid nanodroplets (sizes between 180 and 630 nm) on a solid surface can be investigated by AFM using a miniemulsion, the oil phase consisting of E7 (liquid crystal) and hexadecane as a hydrophobe dispersed in the water phase, stabilized with ionic and steric surfactants such as sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS).…”
Section: Justification Theoretical Framework and Experimental Tesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Gunning et al46 were able to image larger micrometer‐sized oil (tetradecane) droplets in water on a polystyrene (PS) surface. While at low magnification the liquid surface appeared featureless, a close‐up look showed the presence of concentric rings (Figure 5a), which were suggested to be caused by an optical interference effect, as we had previously described for these kinds of round‐shaped objects having topographical contrast in the micrometer range 47. Finally, Tongcher et al48 have reported that stable liquid nanodroplets (sizes between 180 and 630 nm) on a solid surface can be investigated by AFM using a miniemulsion, the oil phase consisting of E7 (liquid crystal) and hexadecane as a hydrophobe dispersed in the water phase, stabilized with ionic and steric surfactants such as sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS).…”
Section: Justification Theoretical Framework and Experimental Tesupporting
confidence: 70%
“…It scatters on the surface of a sample and may interfere with the light scattered from a reflective (back side) part of the cantilever. This phenomenon has been reported for both contact [5] and dynamic (tapping) [6] AFM modes.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…AFM overcomes these disadvantages and provides a three-dimensional image of surface morphology. However, AFM images are usually affected by different kinds of artifacts, such as the microscope design, operational mode, and external environmental factors (Girasole et al 2007;Chen et al 1998;Me´ndez-Vilas et al 2002;Chen and Cai, 2006). AFM probe is a key component of microscopic system; the resolution of images and the information obtained by AFM depend strongly on the probe or tip used, whose artifacts mainly include asymmetric cantilever tips (Kaupp et al 1995) and surface topography of scanning probe (Kitching et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%