2014
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/480/1/012024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical and Structural Study of CuSe and CuSe/In Thin Films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The bad gap values for the non-annealed and pre-annealed films were ~2.2 and ~2.15 eV, respectively. Such values are consistent with earlier literature [6]. The band gap showed only little shift (0.05 eV) by annealing at 150 o C. This indicates lack of nanoparticle growth at this temperature.…”
Section: Cuse Film Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The bad gap values for the non-annealed and pre-annealed films were ~2.2 and ~2.15 eV, respectively. Such values are consistent with earlier literature [6]. The band gap showed only little shift (0.05 eV) by annealing at 150 o C. This indicates lack of nanoparticle growth at this temperature.…”
Section: Cuse Film Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The Cu I ions behave as electron dopants to the film, and are the reason for the n-type behavior. Figure (7) shows effect of CuSe electrode annealing on its photo J-V plots, measured at room temperature in aqueous Fe(CN) 6 3-/Fe(CN) 6 2-/LiClO 4 system. The results are summarized in Table (1), entries (1)(2).…”
Section: Photo J-v Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Graph of total charge passed during chronocoulometry vs literature direct band gap data. Chronocoulometry was carried out at a constant potential of 1.2 V for 1800 s.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The band gaps of ZnSe and CuSe were found to be 2.7 and 2.2 eV, respectively. 35,36 Because of the presence of these impurities, the band gap energy of the AZTSe deposited on conductive substrates increases by about 23% than that of the AZTSe thin films deposited on glass substrates. At the same time, the presence of impurities SnSe (1.3−1.7 eV) and SnSe 2 (1.6 eV) does not affect the band gap of the AZTSe.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%