2020
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2020.2994171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Trap Locations in Bulk FinFETs After Hot Carrier Degradation (HCD)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the trap-based research in HCD, both interface and oxide traps contribute to the overall degradation [ 5 ]. A modified compact model and trap spatial distribution investigations facilitate the accurate characterization of HCD [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. To characterize the trap generation during HCD stress, a discharge-based multi-pulse technique (DMP) was introduced, which is accessible to oxide traps within and beyond the bandgap [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the trap-based research in HCD, both interface and oxide traps contribute to the overall degradation [ 5 ]. A modified compact model and trap spatial distribution investigations facilitate the accurate characterization of HCD [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. To characterize the trap generation during HCD stress, a discharge-based multi-pulse technique (DMP) was introduced, which is accessible to oxide traps within and beyond the bandgap [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2017, Jiang et al proposed an analytical model to capture the temperature of transistors in a digital circuit that is biased under pulse trains characterized by frequency and power duty cycle, then HCI performance is predicted [28]. Yu et al proposed a trap-based compact model [29][30][31], which can accurately predict hot carrier degradation and variation in full V gs /V ds bias. In 2019, a SPICE compatible compact hot carrier degradation time kinetics model was proposed for conventional, lightly doped drain, and drain extended MOSFETs and FinFETs [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The oxide traps generated in planar devices only have one type [29]. The difference can be explained in that FinFET has one more lattice orientation than the planar device [30]. The interface traps and oxide traps (type 1) are mainly located at the channel center closer to the source on the Fin sidewall, while the oxide traps (type 2) are mainly distributed at the channel center closer to the drain on the Fin top [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, other lateral defect profiling techniques were developed to extract DPs induced by hotcarriers (HCs) from an I d -V d (Mamy Randriamihaja et al [11] and Wang et al [12]) or multiple I d -V g s (Yun et al [13]). Exploiting the information in time-dependent variability, Yu et al [14] identified typical locations of different HC-induced traps in finFETs, both along the device width (position in the top or side wall of the fin) as well as along the lateral channel direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%