2019
DOI: 10.1029/2018gl081455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Regional and Seasonal Ozone Depletion Potential of Chlorinated Very Short‐Lived Substances

Abstract: Chloroform (CHCl3), dichloromethane (CH2Cl2), perchloroethylene (C2Cl4), and 1,2‐dichloroethane (C2H4Cl2) are chlorinated Very Short‐Lived Substances (Cl‐VSLS) with a range of commercial/industrial applications. Recent studies highlight the increasing influence of Cl‐VSLS on the stratospheric chlorine budget and therefore their possible role in ozone depletion. Here we evaluate the ozone depletion potential (ODP) of these Cl‐VSLS using a three‐dimensional chemical transport model and investigate sensitivity to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessing the behaviour of the annual Antarctic ozone hole continues to be an important aspect of monitoring the impact of Montreal Protocol controls on ozone depleting substances (ODS) and for observing the effects of Antarctic ozone on the interactions between components of the climate system (Goyal et al 2019;Lickley et al 2020;Solomon et al 2020). While the Montreal Protocol is working to reduce stratospheric ozone loss (WMO 2018), recent increases in some ODS emissions have been identified (Montzka et al 2018;Claxton et al 2019;Fang et al 2019;Rigby et al 2019) with likely effects on recovery of Antarctic ozone (Dhomse et al 2019). At the same time, the accuracy in evaluating ozone trends is influenced by variability in stratospheric conditions and their relationship to large-scale climate modes (Zhang et al 2017;Chipperfield et al 2018;Maycock et al 2018;Ball et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assessing the behaviour of the annual Antarctic ozone hole continues to be an important aspect of monitoring the impact of Montreal Protocol controls on ozone depleting substances (ODS) and for observing the effects of Antarctic ozone on the interactions between components of the climate system (Goyal et al 2019;Lickley et al 2020;Solomon et al 2020). While the Montreal Protocol is working to reduce stratospheric ozone loss (WMO 2018), recent increases in some ODS emissions have been identified (Montzka et al 2018;Claxton et al 2019;Fang et al 2019;Rigby et al 2019) with likely effects on recovery of Antarctic ozone (Dhomse et al 2019). At the same time, the accuracy in evaluating ozone trends is influenced by variability in stratospheric conditions and their relationship to large-scale climate modes (Zhang et al 2017;Chipperfield et al 2018;Maycock et al 2018;Ball et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cl VOCs are dominated by C 1 -C 2 compounds, which represent with ranging from 94.5% to 97.1% of the Cl VOCs . The Cl VOCs with C 1 -C 2 are also called chlorinated very short-lived substances (Cl VSLS ), which are significant sources of the stratospheric chlorines that contribute to ozone depletion (Claxton et al, 2019;Hossaini et al, 2017Hossaini et al, , 2019. The compounds dichloromethane (CH 2 Cl 2 ) and chloroform (CHCl 3 ), accounting for ∼90% and ∼25% of their tropospheric abundance from anthropogenic activities (Hossaini et al, 2015), respectively, are the relatively abundant Cl VSLS produced by the sintering process.…”
Section: Organic Chlorine Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most efficient transport pathway for Cl-VSLS into the stratosphere is suggested to be via the ASMA. This is why Cl-VSLS emissions from the region of continental Asia are suggested to have the highest ozone depletion potential (ODP) compared to emissions from other source regions (Claxton et al, 2019). Their regionally dependent ODP is estimated to be in the range of 0.0097 − 0.0208 (CH 2 Cl 2 ) and 0.0143 − 0.0264 (CHCl 3 ) (for comparison here the ODPs of some other chlorocarbons: CFC-11: 1; CCl 4 : 0.87; HCFC-22: 0.034; CH 3 Cl: 0.015; Carpenter et al, 2018;Claxton et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%