1980
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.2210610206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the analysis of EBIC contrast of crystal defects

Abstract: on the occasion of his 75th birthday EBIC contrast images resulting from glide dislocations in Si having different inclination angles with respect t o the surface are compared with contrast geometry calculations based on two models. For better comparison between theory and experiment the EBIC signal is digitized. With the assumption that contrast is essentially governed by the minimum distance between the excitation centre and the defect, satisfactory agreement between experimental and calculated contrast geom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently Beer et al [7] proposed a different approach in order to describe the geometry of the contrast of inclined straight dislocations. The basic assumption was that the contrast a t a given point of the image is a function of the distance between the centre of the generation and the dislocation line; by this hypothesis a good fit to the observed shape of the contours of equal EBIC signal could be achieved 171.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently Beer et al [7] proposed a different approach in order to describe the geometry of the contrast of inclined straight dislocations. The basic assumption was that the contrast a t a given point of the image is a function of the distance between the centre of the generation and the dislocation line; by this hypothesis a good fit to the observed shape of the contours of equal EBIC signal could be achieved 171.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulations turned out to be in fairly good agreement with experimental images, although they failed to reproduce some observed features. The results of [5] as well as the geometrical comparisons by Beer et al [7] suggested that a reason for the limited fidelity obtained was the use of the uniform generation sphere approximation [8] for describing the ionizat,ion produced by the electron beam in the semiconductor . I) Via Cast,agnoli 1, 40126 Bologna, Italy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EBIC contrast behavior of various types of extended defects, including grain boundaries, stacking faults, and dislocations, have been studied extensively [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Particular attention has been given to the temperature dependence of the EBIC contrast, as plots of contrast at dislocations (C d ) vs. temperature reveal information about extended defect character and impurity decoration [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%