2008 Symposium on VLSI Technology 2008
DOI: 10.1109/vlsit.2008.4588607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On implementation of embedded phosphorus-doped SiC stressors in SOI nMOSFETs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With eSi:C stressor and neutral liner, the I on was enhanced by ~ 28%, which is much higher than the tensile liner effect, indicating eSi:C is a very effective stressor for thick-oxide long-channel nMOS transistors. Although eSi:C was demonstrated to be a very effective stressor for thick-oxide longchannel nMOS transistors shown above, its stress benefit was barely detectable for the state-of-the-art thin-oxide short-channel nMOS devices [4]. The origin of the response discrepancy to eSi:C stressor between "thick-oxide long-channel nMOS" and "thin-oxide short-channel nMOS" is still unclear and need further study.…”
Section: In Situ Phosphorus-doped Esi:cmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With eSi:C stressor and neutral liner, the I on was enhanced by ~ 28%, which is much higher than the tensile liner effect, indicating eSi:C is a very effective stressor for thick-oxide long-channel nMOS transistors. Although eSi:C was demonstrated to be a very effective stressor for thick-oxide longchannel nMOS transistors shown above, its stress benefit was barely detectable for the state-of-the-art thin-oxide short-channel nMOS devices [4]. The origin of the response discrepancy to eSi:C stressor between "thick-oxide long-channel nMOS" and "thin-oxide short-channel nMOS" is still unclear and need further study.…”
Section: In Situ Phosphorus-doped Esi:cmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Considering that the conventional tensile stress liner becomes less and less effective with gate-pitch scaling for future generation nMOS devices, embedded Si:C (eSi:C) stressor becomes a hot topic in recent years [1][2][3][4] owing to its potential to further enhance nMOS channel mobility and drive current beyond the scope of the conventional stressors, such as tensile stress liner (TL) and stress memorization technique (SMT). Among the techniques used to embed Si:C into nMOS source and drian (S/D), the epitaxial growth method [1,3,4] is gaining momentum over the solid phase epitaxy (SPE) approach [2]. The advantage of SPE lies in that it does not require new tools, and it is more compatible with conventional CMOS processing, therefore, it is more cost effective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[45] Clustered carbon implantation has been proposed as an alternative source of carbon that can achieve higher throughput due to removal of the requirement of pre-amorphization implantation. [46,47,48] Although RTP annealing after C implantation is not desired in order to achieve high strain, it was reported that C implantation and deep N + S/D implantation in sequence, with subsequent RTP and LSA annealing, show improved device performance over N + S/D implantation + RTP annealing followed by C implant + LSA. [49] The carbon implantation depth is recommended to be deeper than that of the N + S/D implant in order to reduce parasitic resistance.…”
Section: Sic Nmos S/d Epimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SiC was experimentally proven and introduced as a source and drain material creating a heterojunction, which induced horizontal tensile strain and vertical compressive strain in the silicon channel, thus increasing the current drive by 50 % for a gate length of 50 nm [3]. An increase in the current drive was depicted in a 40 nm device using SiC as a source/drain material [4]. Z. Ren [5] in 2008 discussed SiC with phosphorus material doping to increase the current.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%