Oil Palm Adoption, Household Welfare, and Nutrition Among Smallholder Farmers in Indonesia

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Abstract: The recent expansion of oil palm in Indonesia is largely smallholder-driven. However, its socio-economic implications are under-examined. Analyzing farm-household data from Jambi Province, Sumatra, oil palm adoption is found to have positive consumption and nutrition effects. However, these effects are largely due to farm size expansion that is associated with oil palm adoption. Potential heterogeneity of effects among oil palm adopters is examined using quantile regressions. While nutrition effects of oil palm adoption are found to be homogenous across quantiles, the effects on non-food expenditure are expressed more strongly at the upper end of the expenditure distribution. Terms of use: Documents in

Oil Palm Expansion among Smallholder Farmers in Sumatra, Indonesia

“…Possibly, larger-scale farmers have better access to land and capital. Moreover, oil palm is less labour-intensive than rubber and may therefore be more lucrative for households with a high land-to-labour ratio (Euler et al, 2015).…”

“…Second, the comparative advantage of oil palm vs. rubber also matters. Compared to rubber (the traditional plantation crop in Sumatra), oil palm is less labourintensive, but more capital-and input-intensive and requires different technical knowledge (Feintrenie and Levang, 2009;Euler et al, 2015).…”

Does mixed crop‐livestock farming lead to less diversified diets among smallholders? Evidence from Laos

“…As expected, larger farm size does increase dietary diversity of both groups of farm households across seasons. It is established in the literature that as farm size increases, it positively affects livelihood outcomes, especially income and consumption (e.g., Dillon et al., ; Euler et al., ; Jones et al., ; Oyarzun et al., ). Additionally, on average, wealth too plays a role in improving dietary diversity.…”

Sustainable Tourism Development: the Adaptation and Resilience of the Rural Communities in (the Tourist Villages of) Karimunjawa, Central Java

“…The people in (tourist) villages are most vulnerable to economic turbulence and environmental damage, which can disrupt the people's livelihood and welfare. Livelihood adaptation and the strategies of rural people have been studied (see Dewi et al, 2005;Euler et al, 2017;Harini et al, 2017;Mahdi et al, 2008;Ritohardoyo, 2004;Widianingsih et al, 2016;Wijayanti et al, 2016forest dependence, and welfare in 73 villages. Village economic options, forest cover, and land suitability for agriculture and forestry are determining factors of people's well-being.…”