2018
DOI: 10.1111/agec.12431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Does mixed crop‐livestock farming lead to less diversified diets among smallholders? Evidence from Laos

Abstract: Malnourishment continues to remain a challenge in developing countries. As the undernourished are largely smallholder farmers, it is widely assumed that farm diversification and mixed crop-livestock agricultural systems can help alleviate this problem. However, empirical evidence in this context is limited. Hence, we use a two-year panel's data from Laos to examine whether farm production diversity as well as a mixed crop-livestock farming system improves household dietary diversity among smallholder farmer. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A higher level of household wealth helps to maintain consumption during unanticipated events that demand additional expenditure. This result is consistent with that reported by Parvathi (2018).…”
Section: Role Of Farm Diversity In Food Diversitysupporting
confidence: 94%
“…A higher level of household wealth helps to maintain consumption during unanticipated events that demand additional expenditure. This result is consistent with that reported by Parvathi (2018).…”
Section: Role Of Farm Diversity In Food Diversitysupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Similar to the argument above, this result suggests that TRYRAC interventions contributed to smoothing income and consumption and thus reduced the likelihood of participating households falling below the poverty line in the future. The result is line with the findings of Khonje et al (2018), who report the significant welfare impact of technology adoption in eastern Zambia and the recent study of Parvathi (2018), who finds that improved livestock production can improve food security outcomes among livestock farmers.…”
Section: Impact On Poverty and Vulnerabilitysupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This enables us to control for time‐constant unobserved heterogeneity, which should improve the internal validity of our estimates. And fourth, we contribute to the production diversity–dietary diversity/nutrition literature (see, for example, Hirvonen & Hoddinott, ; Jones et al., ; Kumar, Harris, & Rawat, ; Parvathi, ; Sibhatu et al., ) by studying whether production diversity (proxied in this study by maize–legume intercropping), intensification (proxied by inorganic fertilizer use on maize), or a combination of the two is most beneficial for child nutrition outcomes…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This enables us to control for timeconstant unobserved heterogeneity, which should improve the internal validity of our estimates. And fourth, we contribute to the production diversity-dietary diversity/nutrition literature (see, for example, Hirvonen & Hoddinott, 2017;Jones et al, 2014;Kumar, Harris, & Rawat, 2015;Parvathi, 2018;Sibhatu et al, 2015) by studying whether production diversity (proxied in this study by maize-legume intercropping), intensification (proxied by inorganic fertilizer use on maize), or a combination of the two is most beneficial for child nutrition outcomes. 2 Our results suggest that, compared to the base category of "Nonadoption," adoption of the "SI" treatment group is consistently associated with improvements in children's HAZ and WAZ, particularly for children beyond breast-feeding age (i.e., those age 25-59 months).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%