2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.09.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modeling of hydrodynamics and sediment transport in lower Mississippi at a proposed delta building diversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Day et al, 2016), and we are unaware of any with a subsurface data set as rich as the one available for the ACS. While many workers have published on the "river side" issues concerning diversions, including the sediment available (Kesel, 1988;Blum and Roberts, 2009;Allison et al, 2012) and the physics of extracting sediment from the trunk channel (Allison and Meselhe, 2010;Meselhe et al, 2012;Nittrouer et al, 2012a;Allison et al, 2013), only recently have researchers begun to investigate "basin side" issues that impact SRE (Xu et al, 2016). The availability of detailed sediment-transport data from the modern Lower Mississippi River (LMR) provides a unique opportunity to connect fluvial sediment budgets to the sediments preserved in the delta.…”
Section: Measuring Sediment Retention Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Day et al, 2016), and we are unaware of any with a subsurface data set as rich as the one available for the ACS. While many workers have published on the "river side" issues concerning diversions, including the sediment available (Kesel, 1988;Blum and Roberts, 2009;Allison et al, 2012) and the physics of extracting sediment from the trunk channel (Allison and Meselhe, 2010;Meselhe et al, 2012;Nittrouer et al, 2012a;Allison et al, 2013), only recently have researchers begun to investigate "basin side" issues that impact SRE (Xu et al, 2016). The availability of detailed sediment-transport data from the modern Lower Mississippi River (LMR) provides a unique opportunity to connect fluvial sediment budgets to the sediments preserved in the delta.…”
Section: Measuring Sediment Retention Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is why efforts to save the Mississippi River delta are focused on reconnecting the MAR with wetland basins by constructing artificial, controllable river diversions that will mimic the natural channels that have been lost [20,46,74].…”
Section: Conclusion and Management Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion is proposed on the west bank of the Mississippi River just north of Myrtle Grove, at river mile 60.7 ( Figure 1). The diversion is proposed to have a peak flow of approximately 2100 m 3 /s, which is equivalent to the average annual flow of the Missouri River when flowing at full capacity [31]. The Mid-Barataria Sediment Diversion has a long history in restoration planning [3,23,27,32] and is slated to begin construction in 2021.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%