Non-human agency, radical ontology and tourism realities

Ren, Carina

doi:10.1016/j.annals.2010.12.007

Cited by 144 publications

(82 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A sociomaterialidade (ORLIKOWSKI; SCOTT, 2013) é uma abordagem ainda pouco utilizada nos estudos turísticos, mesmo oferecendo potencial para compreensão do turismo enquanto fenômeno dinâmico e para além da ideia de Home and Away. No turismo, a sociomaterialidade representa pensar na sua produção pautada na relação entre atores-humanos (turistas e não turistas); e os não humanos (objetos e artefatos), incluindo a imaterialidade (as leis, a cultura, a linguagem, a música e a dança), estes que são condicionantes sociais (LEONARDI, 2012;DUIM;REN;JÓHANNESSON, 2012;BISPO, 2016a).…”

Section: Abordagens Sociológicas Do Turismo -Convergindo Para O Campounclassified

“…Assim como Necher (2011), outros autores já têm adotado estratégias metodológicas mais interpretativas, como os que trabalham com a Teoria Ator-Rede (TAR) em turismo (JÓHANNESSON, 2005;DUIM, 2007;REN, 2011;COHEN;COHEN, 2012), com a fenomenologia (COUSIN; O'GORMAN; MARC STIERAND, 2010) e com estudos baseados em prática (CAVALCANTE; SOARES, 2015;BISPO, 2016a;BISPO, 2016b), que pensa o turismo a partir de uma ontologia baseada nas práticas sociais.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Reflexões sobre o processo de aprendizagem social do turismo como prática na orla marítima de João Pessoa/PB

Cavalcante

Bispo

Soares

2018

Caderno Virtual de Turismo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this study is to reflect on the process of social learning and practical tourism (TAP) in Waterfront of João Pessoa/PB. It was also considered understanding of the set of sociomateriais elements (human and non-human) that underpin the TAP in Waterfront. Under the epistemology of social practices, empirical data collection and analysis was used ethnomethodology. As collection techniques, we used informal conversations, direct observation and field diaries. The results indicate that the learning processes occur through experience, socialization, participation and engagement, being mediated by intangibles (nonhuman), such as individualized language and the local culture itself. We conclude that the process of learning influences and is influenced by the TAP, which allows human social actors undertake in Waterfront, making it an organizational space result of organizing.Keywords: Learning Process. Tourism as Practice. João Pessoa. Ethnomethodology. RESUMENEl objetivo de este trabajo es reflexionar sobre el proceso de aprendizaje social y el turismo como práctica (TAP) en el costa marítima de João Pessa/PB. También se consideró la comprensión del conjunto de sociomateriais elementos (humanos y no humanos) que sustentan el TAP en costa marítima. Bajo la epistemología de las prácticas sociales, se utilizó la recopilación de datos empíricos y análisis etnometodología. Como técnicas de recolección, se utilizó conversaciones informales, observación directo y diarios de campo. Los resultados indican que los procesos de aprendizaje se producen a través de la experiencia, la socialización, la participación y compromiso, siendo mediado por los intangibles (no humanos), como el lenguaje individualizado y la propia cultura local. Llegamos a la conclusión de que el proceso de aprendizaje de influencias y está influenciado por el TAP, que permite a los actores sociales humanos se comprometen en costa marítima, por lo que es un resultado espacio organizacional de los procesos organizacionales.

show abstract

Section: Abordagens Sociológicas Do Turismo -Convergindo Para O Campounclassified

Section: Introductionunclassified

Reflexões sobre o processo de aprendizagem social do turismo como prática na orla marítima de João Pessoa/PB

Cavalcante

Bispo

Soares

2018

Caderno Virtual de Turismo

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Theoretically, for instance, we note the rise of an ontological position that is more process-, performance-and practice-oriented, with mobilities being seen as emergent and in need of theorisation as such. This involves, for instance, the use and development of work by Goffman (Jensen, 2006(Jensen, , 2010Licoppe, 2009;Yeoh and Huang, 2010) and de Certeau (Bissell, 2009;Farías, 2010;Kidder, 2009), as well as on affect (Bissell, 2010;Conradson and Latham, 2007;Jensen et al, 2014), practices (Aldred and Jungnickel, 2013;Benson, 2011;Cresswell and Merriman, 2011;Hui, 2013;Larsen, 2008a), creating networks (Blok, 2010;Hui, 2012;Larsen et al, 2006;Larsen, 2008b;Nowicka, 2007;Ren, 2011) and the non-representational (McHugh, 2009;Spinney, 2011;Vannini, 2011). Relatedly, empirical analyses have privileged not the functionality of moving from A to B but experiences and socio-cultural constructions of mobilities (Cresswell, 2006;Jensen, 2009).…”

Section: Curating New Trajectoriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Traces of a Mobile Field: Ten Years of Mobilities Research

Faulconbridge¹,

Hui²

2017

Traces of a Mobile Field

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the launch of this journal ten years ago, the field of mobilities research has developed at a rapid pace. In this editorial introduction we explore how this development has been curated, how the field has evolved, and what maturation might mean for mobilities research. After reviewing how early editorials encouraged particular trajectories of development within mobilities research, we introduce the papers in this special issue, which build upon and re-shape key discussions that have emerged in the last decade. Drawing out issues of power, interdisciplinarity, social processes and futures, the papers raise important questions about not only how understandings of mobilities are changing, but also how the field of mobilities research is itself on the move. Taking up these themes, we examine how understanding mobilities research as a field, following Bourdieu (1984), contributes to considerations of the potential for future struggles, fragmentation, and sub-disciplines. We argue that the open nature and strategic diversity of the mobilities field has fed the successes of the past decade, and therefore needs to remain a priority in the future -with a careful balance curated between convergence around key themes and the exploration of varied 'internal goods' (MacIntyre 1985) which remain an important source of inspiration and creative potential within the field.

show abstract

“…In particular, a number of articles in these two volumes adopt or apply actor-network theory in their interpretations. For example, Ren's (2011) Notably, in line with the orientations of critical tourism studies, a number of authors have adopted a critical theory approach to the scrutiny of tourism research and scholarship (Pernecky & Jamal, 2010;Ren, Pritchard & Morgan, 2010), and to their 8 interpretation of tourism as an encounter for individuals with vision problems (Richards, Pritchard & Morgan, 2010). From the consumer behavior perspective, a number of studies revisit behavior, tourist decision-making, and destination choice (Decrop, 2010;Krider, Arguello, Campbell & Mora, 2010;Smallman & Moore, 2010 …”

Section: Critical Tourism Studies From Paradigmatic Standpoints Maimentioning

confidence: 99%