2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.01.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoscale control of perpendicular magnetic anisotropy, coercive force and domain structure in ultrathin Ru/Co/W/Ru films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume that these features are associated with the presence of the largest Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in the sample [17]. In our previous study, the value of DMI D= 0.2 𝑚𝐽/𝑚 2 was measured [32]. In the Ru/Co/Ru/W samples, these features disappear, which may be due to the absence of DMI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We assume that these features are associated with the presence of the largest Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction in the sample [17]. In our previous study, the value of DMI D= 0.2 𝑚𝐽/𝑚 2 was measured [32]. In the Ru/Co/Ru/W samples, these features disappear, which may be due to the absence of DMI.…”
mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The values of current density j and effective field 𝜇 0 𝐻 𝐿 were substituted by values experimentally defined for I=60 mA. The effective thickness of the ferromagnetic layer was determined as the thickness of the Co layer equal to 0.5 nm taking into account the magnetic dead layer of 0.2 nm at each interface with Ru [32].…”
Section: Table IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the analysis of the magnetic properties and DMI of Ru/Co/W/Ru films, we assumed that t W = 0.24 nm corresponds to a single atomic layer. 20 The crystal structure and interface quality were studied using X-ray diffraction (XRD) and X-ray reflectivity (XRR) measurement techniques (SmartLab, RIGAKU) at CuKa radiation wavelength (1.54184 Å). As a result of the experimental data fitting, we defined the following parameters of each interface: magnetically dead layer (MDL) thickness L and root mean square (RMS) roughness d. More details can be found elsewhere.…”
Section: Experimental Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of the experimental data fitting, we defined the following parameters of each interface: magnetically dead layer (MDL) thickness L and root mean square (RMS) roughness d. More details can be found elsewhere. 20 The magnetic properties of the films were investigated with a vibrating sample magnetometer (7410 VSM, LakeShore). Fig.…”
Section: Experimental Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation