The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2016
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1609618113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanokit for single-cell electrochemical analyses

Abstract: The development of more intricate devices for the analysis of small molecules and protein activity in single cells would advance our knowledge of cellular heterogeneity and signaling cascades. Therefore, in this study, a nanokit was produced by filling a nanometersized capillary with a ring electrode at the tip with components from traditional kits, which could be egressed outside the capillary by electrochemical pumping. At the tip, femtoliter amounts of the kit components were reacted with the analyte to gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
87
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thesame procedure was used to compare the homeostatic performances of different phenotypes of RAW2 64.7 murine macrophages,t hat is,i nt he resting stage (M0 type) or after their 24 hincubation (M1 type) with LPS/IFN-g. [4,5,15,16] Both phenotypes exhibited extremely different morphologies and diverse mean intracellular ROS/RNS concentrations as revealed, respectively,b yb right-field microscopy and DCFH-DAf luorescent staining (see insets in Figure 3A). [17] Figures 3B,C (Supporting Information, Table S2) show that the mean Q 0 value for M1 cells (18 fC) was nearly double that (9.1 fC) for M0 cells.…”
Section: Zuschriftenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thesame procedure was used to compare the homeostatic performances of different phenotypes of RAW2 64.7 murine macrophages,t hat is,i nt he resting stage (M0 type) or after their 24 hincubation (M1 type) with LPS/IFN-g. [4,5,15,16] Both phenotypes exhibited extremely different morphologies and diverse mean intracellular ROS/RNS concentrations as revealed, respectively,b yb right-field microscopy and DCFH-DAf luorescent staining (see insets in Figure 3A). [17] Figures 3B,C (Supporting Information, Table S2) show that the mean Q 0 value for M1 cells (18 fC) was nearly double that (9.1 fC) for M0 cells.…”
Section: Zuschriftenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same procedure was used to compare the homeostatic performances of different phenotypes of RAW 264.7 murine macrophages, that is, in the resting stage (M0 type) or after their 24 h incubation (M1 type) with LPS/IFN‐γ . Both phenotypes exhibited extremely different morphologies and diverse mean intracellular ROS/RNS concentrations as revealed, respectively, by bright‐field microscopy and DCFH‐DA fluorescent staining (see insets in Figure A)…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As another example, a nanometer‐sized capillary with a ring electrode was used to detect intracellular glucose (Figure B) . There, a GOx solution filled the tip capillary, and the capillary was inserted into cells.…”
Section: Electrochemical Intracellular Sensing In Situmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There, a GOx solution filled the tip capillary, and the capillary was inserted into cells. It was then pumped into the cells, and the reaction by‐product was detected using the ring electrode .…”
Section: Electrochemical Intracellular Sensing In Situmentioning
confidence: 99%