My Case

LUIKART, RALPH

doi:10.1001/archderm.1961.01580110047006

Cited by 185 publications

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Work Design

Morgeson

Campion

2003

Handbook of Psychology

169

162

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this chapter we review Industrial/Organizational Psychology research on work design. To do so, the chapter is divided into seven sections. First, the five major work design perspectives are reviewed, including scientific management, job enrichment approaches, sociotechnical systems theory, the social information processing perspective, and the interdisciplinary model of job design. Second, contextual influences (social and structural) on work design are identified. Third, research that has examined the characteristics of work is investigated, including the structure of work, whether work can be viewed as objective characteristics or subjective perceptions, and measurement concerns with existing work design research. In addition, copies of the scales that have been used to operationalize the most common work characteristics are provided. Fourth, the mediating mechanisms assumed to be responsible for work design outcomes are reviewed. Fifth, the outcomes of work design are identified, which includes psychological and behavioral outcomes, as well as individual differences in reactions to work design. Sixth, based on the review, an integrated work design framework is developed (Figure 1). Finally, several additional issues in work design are discussed, including the changing nature of work, tensions inherent in work design approaches, and important work design research needs.

show abstract

Work Design

Morgeson

Campion

2003

Handbook of Psychology

169

162

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Coproduction in the U.S. Department of Defense: Examining How the Evolution of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Expands Non‐Traditional Partner Engagement

Franklin¹,

Mott²,

Williams³

2013

Policy & Internet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study examines interactions between the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and its nontraditional partners. Facilitated by advances in technology hardware and software, the nature of collaboration has changed significantly, shifting from authoritarian to symbiotic relationships. We find that DoD partners have expanded to include geographic information systems (GIS) and information technology professionals, and individual GIS users. As more non-traditional, external partners become involved, the DoD attempts to exert informational power over its partners to assure data integrity and preserve data security. We consider an appropriate role for the DoD in a polycentric regime where public value increasingly is coproduced. This leads us to consider, by analogy, if there are other public policy arenas where data integrity and security concerns will lead to a similar approach.

show abstract

Employee Involvement: Utilization, Impacts, and Future Prospects

Benson

Lawler

2002

The New Workplace

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

My Case

Cited by 185 publications

References 0 publications

Work Design

Work Design

Coproduction in the U.S. Department of Defense: Examining How the Evolution of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Expands Non‐Traditional Partner Engagement

Employee Involvement: Utilization, Impacts, and Future Prospects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About