2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(03)00022-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiscale material removal modeling of chemical mechanical polishing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are many models which describe material removal rate during lapping and polishing, for the example experiment model, the wear model and analytical model [7,8,[13][14][15][16][17]. Based on these models, it can be seen that the material removal rate Z 0 W is directly proportional to the polishing relative velocity V. If the average abrasive grit numbers are n g in a unit polished area, under the condition of an invariant polishing contact pressure, the average material removal rate Z 0 W ðtÞ is as follows [18]:…”
Section: Model Of Dimensionless Distribution Of Materials Removal Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many models which describe material removal rate during lapping and polishing, for the example experiment model, the wear model and analytical model [7,8,[13][14][15][16][17]. Based on these models, it can be seen that the material removal rate Z 0 W is directly proportional to the polishing relative velocity V. If the average abrasive grit numbers are n g in a unit polished area, under the condition of an invariant polishing contact pressure, the average material removal rate Z 0 W ðtÞ is as follows [18]:…”
Section: Model Of Dimensionless Distribution Of Materials Removal Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the region away from where chemical reaction is dominant, in which non-Prestonian behavior generally appears, this equation represents that the material removal rate of a wafer is proportional to the applied pressure on the wafer as well as to the relative velocity between the pad and the wafer. In CMP, recent research results [27,28] strongly support that the wafer and the pad are in direct contact during CMP, in which the abrasives are embedded in the pad asperities, so that twobody abrasion [29] is regarded as the dominant removal mechanism. Based on this observation, the relative velocity in Preston's equation is that between the tool and the workpiece to be finished.…”
Section: Interpretations Of Materials Removal Mechanism Associated Witmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these models did not consider the effect of pad surface roughness (asperity height distribution) on polishing removal rate. There are quite a few other publications considering the effect of pad roughness and other pad properties on polishing removal rate [21,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54].…”
Section: Review Of Modeling Of Pad Effects On Polishing Performancementioning
confidence: 99%