2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2010.04.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multi-objective optimization of shell and tube heat exchangers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The total operating cost is dependent on the pumping power to overcome the pressure drop from both shell and tube side flow [12,18]:…”
Section: Objective Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The total operating cost is dependent on the pumping power to overcome the pressure drop from both shell and tube side flow [12,18]:…”
Section: Objective Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their Pareto curve indicates the contradictory nature of the two objective functions clearly. Sanaye and Haj Abdollahi [12] used a two-objective optimization genetic algorithm to obtain minimum total cost and maximum heat transfer rate. They introduce a suitable limit on the Pareto curve from cost and efficiency points of view, to assist in the heat exchanger design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a smaller refractory inner diameter or greater tube diameter causes greater heat transfer from the helium gas (and thus increased methane conversion) when varied independently, shrinking the refractory inner diameter or increasing the tube diameter requires squeezing the tubes closer together, which quickly becomes impractical without removing some of the tubes. There is a lower bound on tube pitch ratio (C/D) of 1.25 for the triangular and square tube arrangements [32,33] to allow mechanical cleaning of the tubes, and for a clear line-of-sight between the hot helium gas (for radiative heat transfer) and the tube surface, and for adequate space for gas to flow between the tubes without causing a significant pressure drop. The general conclusion here from an optimal design perspective is somewhat obvious in that the shell size and tube spacing should not be bigger than it needs to be.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pressure losses increased by 44.6-48.8 % with the solar installation. Sanaye and Hajabdollahi [10] used a first thermal model which is the eeNTU method which is applicable for optimal design of a shell and tube heat exchanger.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%