2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2014.09.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology control of fluorine-doped tin oxide thin films for enhanced light trapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different growth rates seem to have little effect on the root mean square (RMS) roughness of films deposited using the higher dopant concentration, only varying by ±2 nm. However, deposition at the lower dopant concentration level showed a small, but real decrease in roughness with decreased growth rate, as previously observed by us ( Figure 6) [25]. At high H 2 O concentration, films in general are slightly smoother, i.e., have low RMS values and are in-line with previous reported observations [10].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different growth rates seem to have little effect on the root mean square (RMS) roughness of films deposited using the higher dopant concentration, only varying by ±2 nm. However, deposition at the lower dopant concentration level showed a small, but real decrease in roughness with decreased growth rate, as previously observed by us ( Figure 6) [25]. At high H 2 O concentration, films in general are slightly smoother, i.e., have low RMS values and are in-line with previous reported observations [10].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Samples S7-S9 with different speeds having 0.6 M TFAA and 1:30 Sn/H2O ratio but with different speeds were significantly less resistive and showed p ranging between 6.65 × 10 −4 and 7.53 × 10 −4 Ω·cm. This may be a result of effective substitution of O2 − by F − in the SnO2 lattice [25]. Almost no difference in µ is found, but N marginally decreased from 4.70 × 10 20 to 3.9 × 10 20 cm −3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This morphology is typical as a result of the deposition process of the FTO layer [52,53]. Similarly, Figure 1 shows representative AFM images of substrate A ((c), FTO on glass as purchased), and of substrate B ((d), FTO chemically textured on glass).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…However, some works demonstrated that specific intentional patterning of substrate Affects the spatial distribution and size of the NPs formed by the dewetting process of a deposited film [48][49][50][51]. The FTO layer that we use as substrate is un-intentionally patterned since it is formed by FTO pyramids randomly distributed on the glass slide as result of the deposition process of the same FTO layer [52,53], namely substrate A. We characterized the topography of this substrate by measuring its roughness and mean distance between nearest-neighbor pyramids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, tin oxide is doped to improve its expected properties by some dopants such as indium [17,18], antimony [19], palladium [20], cobalt [21] and fluorine. Depositing fluorine doped tin oxide thin films is usually done by spray pyrolysis [22], sputtering [23], sol-gel [24], and chemical vapor deposition (CVD), which in turn includes different variations such as low pressure CVD [25], plasma enhanced CVD [26], and atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition (AP-CVD) which is very productive and economic [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%