2010
DOI: 10.1177/1461444809349578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mobile social networks and urban public space

Abstract: The development and proliferation of mobile social networks have the potential to transform ways that people come together and interact in public space. These services allow new kinds of information to flow into public spaces and, as such, can rearrange social and spatial practices. Dodgeball is used as a case study of mobile social networks. Based on a year-long qualitative field study, this article explores how Dodgeball was used to facilitate social congregation in public spaces and begins to expand our und… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
106
0
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
106
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead they are a form of generalised exchange where a user broadcasts a request to a wide network of other users and, should she receive help, she may never repay that debt of help directly to the helper. In this sense users can seek help without obligation and avoid the social awkwardness of an exchange relationship (Humphreys, 2010). However, app usage demonstrates that the norms of reciprocity persist in generalised exchange (see Lampinen et al, 2013) as Geoff elaborates: a lot of people wanted to do things for other people but nobody really took them up because maybe you felt you were kind of putting people out.…”
Section: Tourism and Social Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead they are a form of generalised exchange where a user broadcasts a request to a wide network of other users and, should she receive help, she may never repay that debt of help directly to the helper. In this sense users can seek help without obligation and avoid the social awkwardness of an exchange relationship (Humphreys, 2010). However, app usage demonstrates that the norms of reciprocity persist in generalised exchange (see Lampinen et al, 2013) as Geoff elaborates: a lot of people wanted to do things for other people but nobody really took them up because maybe you felt you were kind of putting people out.…”
Section: Tourism and Social Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tourists also maintain contact with close personal ties in other places through social networking tools and those absent may pick up communications later maintaining social ties (Humphreys, 2010). Here individuals use mobile devices to isolate themselves from the immediate social context, what has been described as "psychic cocooning" (Wilken, 2010, p. 452).…”
Section: Relational Network and Gelling Socialitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social media has sparked new interest in the concept of community and research has questioned whether this has eroded traditional placebased community relations by isolating individuals or created new forms of personalized networks (Humphreys, 2010). Festivals are an example of a fluid public-private space where individuals interact across various spatial boundaries and scales of social group both at the festival and with wider social networks beyond the festival site.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Jane,FG2) Apps such as co-mob net (http://www.comob.org. uk/) and 6th Sense (www.sixthsense.com) utilize ( Humphreys, 2010;Sheller, 2004;Wittel, 2001), festival attendees will be used to managing the relational capabilities of smartphones. With increasingly competent users of technology, used to wellestablished and robust apps, users will have high expectations.…”
Section: Conceptual and Practical Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People can for example identify other co-present people with mutual interests, complementary skills, or shared affiliation with particular social groups or community. Mobile social network applications [44] enable users to 'check-in,' i.e. digitally confirm their physical presence at a particular place.…”
Section: Web 20 and Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%