1992
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.45.13788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SiHxexcitation: An alternate mechanism for porous Si photoluminescence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
65
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 345 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
65
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The tunable visible PL in PS may be attributed to SiHx groups (Wolford et al, 1983). This may be further confirmed from the fact that on heat treatment (Prokes et al , 1992) hydrogen is desorbed from the porous silicon and thus the quenching of the PL with temperature (Cullis et al, 1997) due to presence of non-radiative dangling bonds. Further there is a report that surface molecules, specifically siloxene, a by-product of the anodization process and remaining on the surface of the porous silicon (Hamilton , 1995), may be responsible for 'red' PL band (Fuchs et al, 1992).…”
Section: Photoluminescencementioning
confidence: 50%
“…The tunable visible PL in PS may be attributed to SiHx groups (Wolford et al, 1983). This may be further confirmed from the fact that on heat treatment (Prokes et al , 1992) hydrogen is desorbed from the porous silicon and thus the quenching of the PL with temperature (Cullis et al, 1997) due to presence of non-radiative dangling bonds. Further there is a report that surface molecules, specifically siloxene, a by-product of the anodization process and remaining on the surface of the porous silicon (Hamilton , 1995), may be responsible for 'red' PL band (Fuchs et al, 1992).…”
Section: Photoluminescencementioning
confidence: 50%
“…# 12) is shown. This pore widening experiment resulted in a blueshifted weak emission which is in contradiction with the previous report (4). The weak emission in this case can be attributed to excessive removal of oxides which probably leads to an abundant non-radiative recombination centers around nanocrystalline structures.…”
contrasting
confidence: 55%
“…In the early years after Canham´s report, besides the quantum confinement effect, many other models have been proposed to explain the PL emission. The most important to be mentioned here are: recombination via surface states on nanostructures (Koch et al, 1993), siloxene compounds (Brandt, 1992), amorphous phases (George, 1992) and SiH X complexes (Prokes, 1992). A comprehensive model grouping the quantum confinement effect and the contribution of surface states as recombination centers was proposed by Wolkin and coworkers (Wolkin, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%