2018
DOI: 10.1201/9781315165011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microbiological Examination Methods of Food and Water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
32
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…E. coli and Salmonella were detected according to the procedures outlined by Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO, 2010). E. coli was identified based on morphology and Indole, MR, VP, Citrate tests that were identified as either Biotype 1 or Biotype 2 (da Silva et al, 2013).…”
Section: Detection Of E Coli and Salmonellamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E. coli and Salmonella were detected according to the procedures outlined by Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO, 2010). E. coli was identified based on morphology and Indole, MR, VP, Citrate tests that were identified as either Biotype 1 or Biotype 2 (da Silva et al, 2013).…”
Section: Detection Of E Coli and Salmonellamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At each of the three sampling sites on both dates, 2 L of water were directly collected by submerging a sterile polyethylene bottle in the FIGURE 2 Location of sampling sites RS1, RS2 and RS3 in the Manzanares River (La Pedriza, Parque Nacional Sierra de Guadarrama) water column following standard protocols. Total aerobic bacteria were determined following the International Standard ISO 6222:1999, total and faecal coliforms by ISO 9308-2, and faecal enterococci by ISO 7899-2:2000 (Corry, Curtis, & Baird, 2011;Da Silva et al, 2013).…”
Section: Bacterial Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All containers of those samples were opened every week of storage to expose to air between 15 and 20 min, thus a large proportion of CO 2 was released and the amount of remaining CO 2 might not enough to inhibit the mold and yeast. Moreover, this temperature (25 °C) is quite favorable for the growth of mold and yeast (Da Silva et al, ). As a result, the spoilage of the samples with 300, 600, and 900 ppm CO 2 happened at a similar time (Days 8, 9, and 10, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results indicated that the storage temperature greatly affected the growth of mold and yeast. The majority of spoiling molds and yeasts found in cheese products are mesophilic species with an optimal temperature for growth ranging from 15 to 30 °C (Da Silva et al, ), thus they develop at 25 °C much faster than at 7 °C. This result is in agreement with the findings of previous studies (Chen & Hotchkiss, ; Perveen, Alabdulkarim, & Arzoo, ) in which it was reported that a low temperature was much more effective in extending the shelf life of cheese than a high temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%