2015
DOI: 10.1037/a0037107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Michael can’t read!” Teachers’ gender stereotypes and boys’ reading self-concept.

Abstract: According to expectancy-value theory, the gender stereotypes of significant others such as parents, peers, or teachers affect students' competence beliefs, values, and achievement-related behavior. Stereotypically, gender beliefs about reading favor girls. The aim of this study was to investigate whether teachers' gender stereotypes in relation to reading-their belief that girls outperform boys-have a negative effect on the reading self-concept of boys, but not girls. We drew on a longitudinal study comprising… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
84
1
20

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
3
84
1
20
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors, accounting for methodological factors, claim that some evidence suggests that more boys score in the tail of the distribution, and hence they are consequently identified as poor readers (Flannery, Liederman, Daly, & Schultz, 2000). Others maintain that boys demonstrate greater variability in scores or perceive the cause of boys' backwardness in teachers' stereotypic attitudes (Retelsdorf, Schwartz, & Asbrock, 2015). However, this area of research has focused on reading generally; little research has been conducted on boys' variability in specific aspects of reading.…”
Section: Reading Competencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some authors, accounting for methodological factors, claim that some evidence suggests that more boys score in the tail of the distribution, and hence they are consequently identified as poor readers (Flannery, Liederman, Daly, & Schultz, 2000). Others maintain that boys demonstrate greater variability in scores or perceive the cause of boys' backwardness in teachers' stereotypic attitudes (Retelsdorf, Schwartz, & Asbrock, 2015). However, this area of research has focused on reading generally; little research has been conducted on boys' variability in specific aspects of reading.…”
Section: Reading Competencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Des études récentes relèvent également des différences de comportements des enseignants dans le cadre de l'éducation physique et sportive (Couchot-Schiex, 2013) et le jeu des interactions genrées entre enseignants et élèves (Amade-Escot, 2005 ;Guerandel, 2014 ;Vinson & Amade-Escot, 2014). En outre, les représentations qu'ont les enseignants à propos des compétences académiques des garçons et des filles influencent le sentiment de compétences des élèves (Gunderson, Ramirez, Levine et al, 2012 ;Retelsdorf, Schwartz & Asbrock, 2015).…”
Section: Socialisation De Genre : Un Processus Multidimensionnelunclassified
“…A study by Marsh and Martin (2011) evinces that self-concept on academic achievement affect to one's ability. More specifically, experts reveal that self-concept of reading is strongly associated with reading skills (Marsh & Carven, 2006;Valentine & DuBois, 2005;De Naeghel et al, 2012;Retelsdorf, Köller, & Möller, 2014;Retelsdorf, Schwartz, & Asbrock, 2015;Viljaranta, Kiuru, Lerkkanen, Silinskas, Poikkeus, & Nurmi, 2016). In addition, reading motivation is also linked to the desire to improve reading skills.…”
Section: Students' Motivation To Readmentioning
confidence: 99%