2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2010.03.128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metrological performance of optical coordinate measuring machines under industrial conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The dimensions verified in this work piece are the following: The diameter (D) of each of the buttons, the height (A) of button 1, and the length (L) of each of the sides (LA, LB, LC, and LD). The nominal values of each dimension are the following: D = 5.0 mm, A = 1.7 mm, LA and LB = 31.0 mm, and LB and LD = 16.0 mm ( Figure 5 f) [ 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dimensions verified in this work piece are the following: The diameter (D) of each of the buttons, the height (A) of button 1, and the length (L) of each of the sides (LA, LB, LC, and LD). The nominal values of each dimension are the following: D = 5.0 mm, A = 1.7 mm, LA and LB = 31.0 mm, and LB and LD = 16.0 mm ( Figure 5 f) [ 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of this artifact is that there exists a single mismatch position of the calottes, allowing five different parallel length measurement distances as required by the ISO 10360-8 standard. Similar to sphere cube calottes, PTB [10] also developed a sphere plate calotte artifact (Fig. 2c).…”
Section: Performance Verification Of Microscalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a simple design is important to facilitate the verification procedure [9], making it short enough, including both set-up and execution of the procedure, so that it is compatible with industrial requirements. Many studies have been conducted regarding procedures and artifacts for performance evaluation of optical distance sensor (non-contact) metrology instruments in macroscale metrology [10], [11], [12].…”
Section: Performance Verification Of Microscalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors found that the influences of an extraneous light and reflections are the reasons for the higher uncertainty values. In [ 8 ], Carmignato presented an industrial comparison of CMMs equipped with optical sensors, performed in Europe through 1.5-year time period. Participants were chosen mainly from small-medium size industrial companies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%