2021
DOI: 10.1063/5.0014654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Methods to determine the radiated power in SPI-mitigated disruptions in JET

Abstract: This paper presents techniques for evaluating the radiated power in JET disruptions. Disrupting plasmas are shown to have non-axisymmetric radiation profiles, motivating the re-evaluation of the standard techniques for calculating the total radiated power at JET using bolometry. Four single-channel bolometers at different toroidal locations are exploited to quantify the radiation asymmetry. Toroidal radiation peaking factors integrated over the entire disruption of up to 1.5 have been observed when varying the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the trends derived from these works have helped to build an understanding of mitigation performance dependencies, reactor class devices like ITER require absolute measurements to ensure the lifetime of the first wall and divertor. A recent work demonstrates that radiated power calculations in a small toroidal wedge containing a horizontal or vertical bolometer array suffers from errors up to ±50% when the location of the source in the poloidal plane is unknown [52]. The errors incurred from toroidal peaking are in principle unbounded with the usual small number of point-like measurements in the toroidal direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the trends derived from these works have helped to build an understanding of mitigation performance dependencies, reactor class devices like ITER require absolute measurements to ensure the lifetime of the first wall and divertor. A recent work demonstrates that radiated power calculations in a small toroidal wedge containing a horizontal or vertical bolometer array suffers from errors up to ±50% when the location of the source in the poloidal plane is unknown [52]. The errors incurred from toroidal peaking are in principle unbounded with the usual small number of point-like measurements in the toroidal direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, fast camera observations of the disrupting plasmas reveal a large helical structure during the TQ. Using radiation phantoms to match the individual line-of-sight measurements [12], the analysis can be improved, resulting in higher radiation efficiency [13]. However, in some cases the radiated fraction remains low.…”
Section: Thermal Load Mitigation Using Mixtures Of Deuterium and Neonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach can lead to systematic errors if the radiation emission profile is poloidally peaked. The potential error arising from highly localised emission was calculated to be +/−50% for the vertical camera and +/−30% for the horizontal camera in the most extreme cases [12]. Due to its lower sensitivity to poloidal emission location, the radiated energies presented will be inferred from the horizontal camera and the data processed identically to past disruption mitigation experiments on JET [13].…”
Section: Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%