1966
DOI: 10.1126/science.153.3736.658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Memory Transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spectacular reports in high-profile journals of success in transferring memory between animals by injections of RNA or protein extracted from the brains of trained animals into naive animals buoyed the belief in a molecular memory trace (Babich and others 1965; Rosenblatt and others 1966; Ungar and Oceguera-Navarro 1965; Reiniš and Koloušek 1968). These studies were subsequently discredited (Luttges and others 1966; Byrne and others 1966), but the dispute continued into the 1970s with positive results reported in leading journals (Golub and others 1970). …”
Section: Search For the Engram: A Brief Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spectacular reports in high-profile journals of success in transferring memory between animals by injections of RNA or protein extracted from the brains of trained animals into naive animals buoyed the belief in a molecular memory trace (Babich and others 1965; Rosenblatt and others 1966; Ungar and Oceguera-Navarro 1965; Reiniš and Koloušek 1968). These studies were subsequently discredited (Luttges and others 1966; Byrne and others 1966), but the dispute continued into the 1970s with positive results reported in leading journals (Golub and others 1970). …”
Section: Search For the Engram: A Brief Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experiments over the past four years have implicated RNA in learning and memory, although contradictory results have appeared (see Gaito, 1966;Byrne et al, 1966). Glasky & Simon (1966) reported that magnesium pemOline, a mild central nervous system stimulant, augments brain RNA polymerase, which is presumed to facilitate endogenous RNA production.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Representative of the views of the dissenters is a letter to Science signed by twenty-three scientists who, in seven different laboratories, had been unable to confirm any ofthe claims for "transfer oflearning by injection of brain-extract from trained donors" [38]. Their implicit acceptance of the prevailing views of memory and learning is illustrated in their concluding sentence: "Furthermore, we feel that it would be unfortunate if these negative findings were to be taken as a signal for abandoning the pursuit of a result ofenormous potential significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%