1967
DOI: 10.3758/bf03330646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disruption of passive avoidance learning by magnesium pemoline

Abstract: Magnesium pemoline, a central nervous stimulant which may affect brain RNA production, produces a deficit in passive avoidance behavior. The main effect of the drug appears to be stimulation, with no effect on learning.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1978
1978

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 (1) effect than for its having the effect of enhancing learning and memory. For example, recent reports show that MP produces increased motor activity (Boitano & Boitano, 1967) and a deficit in passive-avoidance learning, where animals are required to inhibit a response (Gurowitz, Lubar, Ain, & Gross, 1967). However, the picture at this point is confused by differences among the various reports in such variables as stock of Sand the type of task used to assess the effeet ofMP.…”
Section: Magnesium Pemoline: Different Effectsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…17 (1) effect than for its having the effect of enhancing learning and memory. For example, recent reports show that MP produces increased motor activity (Boitano & Boitano, 1967) and a deficit in passive-avoidance learning, where animals are required to inhibit a response (Gurowitz, Lubar, Ain, & Gross, 1967). However, the picture at this point is confused by differences among the various reports in such variables as stock of Sand the type of task used to assess the effeet ofMP.…”
Section: Magnesium Pemoline: Different Effectsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Positive findings with avoidance studies (Plotnikoff, 1966;Beach & Kimble, 1967;Powell, Martin, & Kamano, 1967a, b;Filby, Szara, & Salzman, 1967;Frey & Polidora, 1967;Kulkarni, 1967;and Thompson & Knudson, 1968) have indicated that MP may facilitate performance although the results have not always been interpreted as demonstrating an effect upon learning or memory. Negative findings with MP in an avoidance task have been reported by Cyert, Moyer, & Chapman (1967), Chase & Rescorla (1968), and Gurowitz et al (1967).…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The interpretation of its effects has centered around the distinction between performance and learning. Other studies have failed to demonstrate any effect of magnesium pemoline on behavior (Chase & Rescorla, 1968;Gurowitz et al, 1967;McCarroll & Korbel, 1968;Cyert et al, 1967). The conflicting results are not at all surprising when one finds variation in these studies in terms of species of animals used, drug dosages, administration route of the drug, training procedures, apparatuses, dependent variables, criterion of learning, and such conditioning parameters as shock intensity, scrambled vs non scrambled shock, CS, UCS and intertrial intervals, and type of CS employed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%