2000
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.244371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measuring Growth Opportunities

Abstract: Although the impact of growth opportunities on company value has been recognised since Miller and Modigliani (1961), relatively little empirical work has been undertaken to value growth opportunities. In this paper we test the validity of the KBM model (Kester (1984) and Brealey and Myers (1981)) on a sample of 278 large UK companies for 1987-1995. Applying standard assumptions, we find the value of growth opportunities to account for a larger proportion of market values than assets-in-place.However, tests of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in common with most studies which tend to apply proxies, rather than valuation models to estimate growth opportunities (Danbolt et al (2000)). Rajan and Zingales suggest that, a priori, one would expect a negative relation between growth opportunities and the level of gearing.…”
Section: Theory and Practice Of Capital Structurementioning
confidence: 74%
“…This is in common with most studies which tend to apply proxies, rather than valuation models to estimate growth opportunities (Danbolt et al (2000)). Rajan and Zingales suggest that, a priori, one would expect a negative relation between growth opportunities and the level of gearing.…”
Section: Theory and Practice Of Capital Structurementioning
confidence: 74%
“…The market-to-book ratio is a usual approximation to Tobin's Q which uses the cost of the reposition of assets instead of market values. This ratio (Q) is defined as the market value of assets divided by the book value of assets, where the market value of assets is the book value of assets less common equity plus the stock market capitalisation (Andrés et al, 2005;Danbolt et al, 2002;Johnson, 1997aJohnson, , 1997bLang et al, 1996;Miguel and Pindado, 2001;Ozkan, 2002;Ozkan and Ozkan, 2004;Rajan and Zingales, 1995). 5 The descriptive statistics of Table 1, Panel A, reveal that for our sample, the average firm has growth opportunities because Q is higher than 1: 1.2793.…”
Section: Data Variables and Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A key aspect of this study is identifying and measuring growth opportunities, given the close relation between firm value and growth opportunities (Adam and Goyal 2008;Berger and Ofek 1995;Danbolt et al 2002;Gordon and Myers 1998). Although a number of different measures can proxy growth opportunities, including the price-to-earnings ratios and market-to-book (MBA) ratios, Adam and Goyal (2008) show that the MBA ratio has the highest information content with respect to investment opportunities.…”
Section: Sample and Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%