2016
DOI: 10.1186/s40608-016-0126-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Measurement of overweight and obesity an urban slum setting in sub-Saharan Africa: a comparison of four anthropometric indices

Abstract: BackgroundAs a result of both genetic and environmental factors, the body composition and topography of African populations are presumed to be different from western populations. Accordingly, globally accepted anthropometric markers may perform differently in African populations. In the era of rapid emergence of cardio-vascular diseases in sub-Saharan Africa, evidence about the performance of these markers in African settings is essential. The aim of this study was to investigate the inter-relationships among … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
12
2
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
12
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the prevalence of abdominal obesity by WC, WTHR and WHR was 64.5%, 74.1% and 42.5%, respectively. Consistent with other studies (Ashwell, & Gibson, 2016;Haregu, Oti, Egondi, & Kyobutungi, 2016), and irrespective of the criteria used in diagnosing abdominal obesity among our cohort participants, the findings mirrors discordant results. This indicates the difficulty and the controversy concerning the measurement of abdominal obesity using different diagnostic criteria.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Overall, the prevalence of abdominal obesity by WC, WTHR and WHR was 64.5%, 74.1% and 42.5%, respectively. Consistent with other studies (Ashwell, & Gibson, 2016;Haregu, Oti, Egondi, & Kyobutungi, 2016), and irrespective of the criteria used in diagnosing abdominal obesity among our cohort participants, the findings mirrors discordant results. This indicates the difficulty and the controversy concerning the measurement of abdominal obesity using different diagnostic criteria.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The population and sample in this study were all students in grades 1 to 6 of the Rama Integrated Islamic Primary School in Makassar City who were registered and active in 2009 as many as 146 people, and sampling was performed using exhaustic sampling techniques. Data collected were consumption patterns and nutritional counseling conducted through direct interviews using questionnaires, food frequency questionnaire, prepared 2x24 hour recall food method, anthropometric data including body weight and height (weight was measured using tread scales with capacity 150 kg with a precision level of 0.1 kg) (Haregu et al, 2016). while height was measured using microtoise with capacity of 200 cm with a precision…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependent variables of this study were BMI and WC. BMI was chosen for being the most commonly used indicator of adiposity and thus easily comparable to other studies, while WC is thought to be more strongly associated with health risks in SSA populations [29,31]. Obesity in terms of BMI was defined as per WHO standards as a BMI ≥ 30 kg/ m 2 [32].…”
Section: Dependent Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%