2001
DOI: 10.1117/12.453615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<title>Development of optimal grinding and polishing tools for aspheric surfaces</title>

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The linear trend was fitted with the experimental data (ɛ 0 , Δɛ, and ΔZ) to obtain the slope of the SF function, i.e., k. Hence, κ total could be calculated from (6).…”
Section: Smoothing Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The linear trend was fitted with the experimental data (ɛ 0 , Δɛ, and ΔZ) to obtain the slope of the SF function, i.e., k. Hence, κ total could be calculated from (6).…”
Section: Smoothing Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with active stress laps [5] and semi-flexible tools [6], an RC lap provides numerous advantages, such as ease of large-scale manufacture, superior surface roughness, and a highly stable theory-like tool influence function (TIF). However, the RC-lap smoothing efficiency performance is poorer than expected [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a wildly recognized challenge in this technology, i.e., the instability of TIF, which causes by some factors, such as the distortion of tool surface, the variety of tool rigidity. In CCOS, the unstable TIF will lead to the uncertainty in the material removal, and reduce the fabricating precision and efficiency of optical components [1][2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 However, when a rotating (and so rotationally-symmetric) rigid tool moves across an asphere, there is a varying misfit. In the general case of an off-axis asphere (or freeform), where a rotating rigid tool follows a pre-determined tool-path, three types of misfit are defined as: Misfit-1: Misfit of the rotationally-symmetric rigid tool to the surface Misfit-2: Misfit due to the change in surface asphericity along one tool-path trajectory.…”
Section: Principle Of Misfit 41 Definition Of Misfitmentioning
confidence: 99%