2019
DOI: 10.2147/prbm.s191805
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

<p>The paradox role of extraversion in the cross-cultural adjustment process of Asian expatriates</p>

Abstract: Background: The purpose of this study is to present a broad-brush picture based on empirical evidence on the role of hindrance stressors, motivation, and cultural novelty in expatriate adjustment. Drawing on trait activation theory, this study examines the moderating role of extraversion in enhancing cultural adjustment to achieve positive work engagement and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) by expatriates. Methods: We gathered data using a sample of 458 eastern expa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This empirical finding confirmed the empirical findings of most of the extant studies reviewed. It specifically collaborates with the position of Hemmasi and Downes (2013), Demes and Geeraert (2014), Eyoun et al (2016) and Rafiq et al (2019) that distance between expatriates’ home and host countries cultural values computed by Kogut and Singh’s (1988) formula significantly and negatively influences the psychological adjustment of expatriates. The finding also supports the empirical position of Vromans et al (2013) and Bolat et al (2017) that the psychological well-being of expatriates is more promoted in culturally similar countries than culturally dissimilar countries measured in objective or absolute values of the differences between expatriate’s home and host country’s cultural values dimensions (UCV, ICV, MCV and PCV) using Kogut and Singh’s (1988) formula.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…This empirical finding confirmed the empirical findings of most of the extant studies reviewed. It specifically collaborates with the position of Hemmasi and Downes (2013), Demes and Geeraert (2014), Eyoun et al (2016) and Rafiq et al (2019) that distance between expatriates’ home and host countries cultural values computed by Kogut and Singh’s (1988) formula significantly and negatively influences the psychological adjustment of expatriates. The finding also supports the empirical position of Vromans et al (2013) and Bolat et al (2017) that the psychological well-being of expatriates is more promoted in culturally similar countries than culturally dissimilar countries measured in objective or absolute values of the differences between expatriate’s home and host country’s cultural values dimensions (UCV, ICV, MCV and PCV) using Kogut and Singh’s (1988) formula.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Liczne badania zostały przeprowadzone w krajach azjatyckich: w Chinach (Selmer, 1995;Takeuchi, Wang i Marinova, 2009;Lee i Kartika, 2014;Rafiq, Saleem, Bashir i Ali, 2019); w Japonii (Peltokorpi i Froese, 2009;Yamazaki, 2010); w Korei Południowej (Froese, 2012). W ostatnich latach kwestie dostosowania ekspatriantów badane są także w krajach afrykańskich (Okpara, 2016)…”
Section: Wiek Jako Czynnik Determinujący Adaptację Ekspatriantówunclassified
“…It should be emphasized that most of the research on the adaptation of expatriates was conducted in Asian countries, including China (Lee & Kartika, 2014;Rafiq et al, 2019;Selmer, 1995;Takeuchi et al, 2009); Japan (Peltokorpi & Froese, 2009;Yamazaki, 2010); South Korea (Froese, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%