2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Loss estimation in Istanbul based on deterministic earthquake scenarios of the Marmara Sea region (Turkey)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
53
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The applications of these tools mentioned here have been conducted for some parts of Istanbul (Karaman et al 2008b;Sesetyan et al 2011). Additionally, many comprehensive studies have been carried out in order to assess the seismic risks in Istanbul (Atakan et al 2002;Erdik et al 2003;Bal et al 2008;Ansal et al 2009). However, none of the studies carried out for Istanbul were able to provide an integrated system that generates physical models of urban areas including soil and structural systems.…”
Section: Application Of New Ies System For Istanbulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applications of these tools mentioned here have been conducted for some parts of Istanbul (Karaman et al 2008b;Sesetyan et al 2011). Additionally, many comprehensive studies have been carried out in order to assess the seismic risks in Istanbul (Atakan et al 2002;Erdik et al 2003;Bal et al 2008;Ansal et al 2009). However, none of the studies carried out for Istanbul were able to provide an integrated system that generates physical models of urban areas including soil and structural systems.…”
Section: Application Of New Ies System For Istanbulmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, various methods have been proposed and implemented to depict the consequences of hypothetical earthquakes in terms of risks (e.g., Karimi and Hüllermeier, 2007), structural damages (e.g., Bird and Bommer, 2004;Feyza Cinicioglu et al, 2007;Ansal et al, 2009), fatalities (e.g., Hashemi and Alesheikh, 2011b;Ansal et al, 2009;Coburn and Spence, 2002;JICA, 2000), and the economic costs (e.g., Montoya and Masser, 2005;Ergonul, 2005) all over the world and especially for the city of Tehran (JICA, 2000;Hashemi and Alesheikh, 2011b).…”
Section: Hashemi and A A Alesheikh: Development And Implementatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there have been many studies and proposed methods of fatality appraisals around the world (Ansal et al, 2009;JICA, 2000;Coburn and Spence, 2002), the Hashemi and Alesheikh (2011b) method is preferred here, because its parameters are customized for the city of Tehran, where EDA tool is assumed to be used. They estimated the number of casualties in each building separately based on its type, percent damage, population, and the day/night fatality ratio in the following manner:…”
Section: Casualty Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earthquake hazard in the Marmara region has been studied by probabilistic methods (Atakan et al 2002;Erdik et al 2004). In addition to these earthquake hazard assessment studies, some researchers have attempted to model bedrock ground motions in the Marmara region using the hybrid broadband simulation technique Sørensen et al 2007, Ansal et al 2009Tanircan 2012;Mert et al 2014a, b). merged deterministic simulation for low-frequency ground motion with a semi-stochastic procedure forhigh-frequency ground motion in order to model broadband seismic wave propagation at bedrock in the Marmara region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sørensen et al (2007) also used the same hybrid model semi-stochastic methodology to estimate high frequencies and a deterministic model for low frequencies to assess the effect of source and attenuation parameters on simulated ground motion. Ansal et al (2009), to improve loss scenarios from earthquake, especially in terms of damage to buildings and casualties in Istanbul, calculated synthetic time series of ground motion using a methodology based on a hybrid stochastic-deterministic approach. Tanircan (2012), using a finite difference algorithm and combining it with a three-dimensional velocity structure for low-frequency and a stochastic algorithm for highfrequency earthquake simulation, obtained hybrid simulation of ground motion for Istanbul for three different scenarios as a result of an M w = 7.2 earthquake on the PIF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%