2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limitations on adaptation to foreign accents

Abstract: Although foreign accents can be highly dissimilar to native speech, existing research suggests that listeners readily adapt to foreign accents after minimal exposure. However, listeners often report difficulty understanding non-native accents, and the time-course and specificity of adaptation remain unclear. Across five experiments, we examined whether listeners could use a newly learned feature of a foreign accent to eliminate lexical competitors during online speech perception. Participants heard the speech … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(95 reference statements)
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Socio-linguistic factors may also influence processing; listeners are more tolerant of variation and errors in non-native than native speech (Hanulíková et al, 2012;Schmid & Yeni-Komshian, 1999) and process it in less detail (Lev-Ari & Keysar, 2012). Word recognition can also be delayed if listeners are less confident of correctly identifying the input (McQueen & Huettig, 2012;Trude, Tremblay & Brown-Schmidt, 2013), possibly to avoid incorrectly recognising words and then needing to apply costly repair processes. Factors such as these may then modulate listeners' expectations about accented speech in addition to accent intelligibility and so influence the N400.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Socio-linguistic factors may also influence processing; listeners are more tolerant of variation and errors in non-native than native speech (Hanulíková et al, 2012;Schmid & Yeni-Komshian, 1999) and process it in less detail (Lev-Ari & Keysar, 2012). Word recognition can also be delayed if listeners are less confident of correctly identifying the input (McQueen & Huettig, 2012;Trude, Tremblay & Brown-Schmidt, 2013), possibly to avoid incorrectly recognising words and then needing to apply costly repair processes. Factors such as these may then modulate listeners' expectations about accented speech in addition to accent intelligibility and so influence the N400.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The visual world eye-tracking paradigm used by Trade et al (2013) is an online measure that tracks the listener's eye fixations to both the target and the competitors. It examines the time course of the lexical retrieval process during foreign-accented word recognition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such deviations make foreign-accented speech (henceforth, accented speech) more difficult to cope with than native speech. That is, despite listeners' abilities to adapt to accented speakers (e.g., Clarke & Garrett, 2004; although see Floccia, Butler, Goslin, & Ellis, 2009;Trude, Tremblay, & Brown-Schmidt, 2013 for counterexamples), accented speech is typically less intelligible and harder to understand than native speech (Munro & Derwing, 1995;van Wijngaarden, 2001). For non-native speakers, language processing is harder to begin with, at all linguistic levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%