2010
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09070956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life-Threatening Danger and Suppression of Attention Bias to Threat

Abstract: These data challenge current thinking about the role of attention in stress responding. Attentional threat avoidance may reduce the acute impact of imminent threat, but this may come at a price in terms of an elevated risk for psychopathology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
167
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(41 reference statements)
16
167
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results have been shown in combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (Constans, McCloskey, Vasterling, Brailey, & Mathews, 2004;Sipos, Bar-Haim, Abend, Adler, & Bliese, 2014;Wald, Lubin, et al, 2011;Wald, Shechner, et al, 2011), and also in civilians who are regularly exposed to life-threatening danger (Bar-Haim et al, 2010). A third characteristic of threat-related attentional bias is the difficulty in disengagement (i.e., it is harder to disengage attention from a threat stimulus relative to a neutral stimulus; Cisler & Olatunji, 2010;Mogg, Holmes, Garner, & Bradley, 2008;Salemink, van den Hout, & Kindt, 2007).…”
Section: Threat-related Attentional Biassupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar results have been shown in combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (Constans, McCloskey, Vasterling, Brailey, & Mathews, 2004;Sipos, Bar-Haim, Abend, Adler, & Bliese, 2014;Wald, Lubin, et al, 2011;Wald, Shechner, et al, 2011), and also in civilians who are regularly exposed to life-threatening danger (Bar-Haim et al, 2010). A third characteristic of threat-related attentional bias is the difficulty in disengagement (i.e., it is harder to disengage attention from a threat stimulus relative to a neutral stimulus; Cisler & Olatunji, 2010;Mogg, Holmes, Garner, & Bradley, 2008;Salemink, van den Hout, & Kindt, 2007).…”
Section: Threat-related Attentional Biassupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Most studies investigating threat-related attentional bias involve clearly visible stimuli that are presented for at least 500 ms, to allow for conscious processing (Bar-Haim et al, 2007). Results of recent studies using longer exposure times found attentional bias toward and/or away from threat stimuli (Bar-Haim et al, 2010;Naim et al, 2015;Zvielli et al, 2014), which is in line with the vigilance-avoidance pattern. Yet, the finding of an attentional bias in response to a stimulus that is presented for a longer duration (i.e., supraliminal exposure) does not allow for the distinction between the contributions of a preconscious bias to the threatening stimulus and a bias that requires awareness of that stimulus.…”
Section: Threat-related Attentional Biasmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[5][6][7][8][9] Evidence of such attention avoidance has emerged in research on combat veterans with PTSD, [10] in soldiers undergoing combat simulation, [11] and in civilians exposed to a lifethreatening danger. [12] These latter studies also reveal a significant inverse correlation between attentional threat avoidance and severity of PTSD symptoms during the acute stress phase. Again, this inverse correlation contrasts with the typical positive correlation manifest between attention biases and anxiety, when individuals are studied in low-stress environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Attentional avoidance of threat-related stimuli has been associated with greater distress in people exposed to acute stressors, such as rocket attacks (11). However, other cross-sectional research finds that veterans with elevated PTSD symptoms show an attentional bias toward negative images compared to veterans with low levels of PTSD symptoms (33,34).…”
Section: Depressive Symptomsmentioning
confidence: 99%