Leukocyte Culture and Chromosome Preparations from Adult Dog Blood

Ford, Lee

doi:10.3109/10520296509116437

Cited by 11 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Once Hsu and Pomerat (1953) discovered that exposure of cultured cells to hypotonic treatment readily disperses chro mosomes, the canine diploid number was definitely established as 78 (M atthey, 1954; T akayama, 1958; A wa et ah, 1959; Moore and Lambert, 1963;Gijstavsson, 1964;Ford, 1965Ford, , 1966G ustavsson and Sundt, 1965;H are et al, 1965;Chiarelei, 1966). Although the sex chromosomes are readily recognized, differentiation of homologous pairs of autosomes by conventional staining methods is difficult since all are Supported by NIH grant GM-20138 from the U.S. Public Health Service.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Giemsa banding pattern of the canine karyotype

Selden

Moorhead

Oehlert

et al. 1975

Cytogenet Genome Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The canine metaphase karyotype consists of 78 chromosomes. All autosomes exhibit telocentric or acrocentric configurations gradually diminishing in size. These features make identification of homologous pairs by conventional analysis difficult.Chromosome preparations were derived from short-term cultures of peripheral blood lymphocytes obtained from clinically normal dogs representing at least four breeds. Most components of the canine karyotype can be distinguished readily. No significant G-banding pattern variations were detected in the individuals screened. An idiogrammatic interpretation of the banding pattern is presented. Apart from bands, other characteristic morphologic features were found which aid in identification. The G-banding pattern of the canine metacentric X is quite similar to that of the banded human X. The canine Y is a minute metacentric having two positive bands.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Giemsa banding pattern of the canine karyotype

Selden

Moorhead

Oehlert

et al. 1975

Cytogenet Genome Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Reports of many authors have confirmed the chromosome number of the normal dog as 78 (MAKINO 1949;MATTHEY 1954;AwA et al 1959;MooRE and LAMBERT 1963;GusTAVSSON 1964;FoRD 1965;GusTAvssoN and SuNDT 1965) all of which, with the exception of the sex chromosomes, are telocentric or acrocentric. The X chromosome is submetacentric and one of the largest in the complement.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 68%

Cytogenetic Study of a Canine Neuroblastoma

Duran-Troise

Lustig

1974

Caryologia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This appears to be the first report of a chromosome abnormality in a phenotypically normal dog (cf. Minouchi, 1928Minouchi, : M aking», 1951Avva et al, 1959;Moore andLambert, 1963: G ustavsson, 1964;Ford, 1965;Borgaonkar etal., 1968).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Chromosomal abnormality in a phenotypically and clinically normal dog

S.F.¹,

Gilmore²

1971

Cytogenet Genome Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A seven-month-old black female setter-retriever cross was found to have a modal chromosome number of 77 and an apparent centric fusion of two autosomes. Extensive clinical examinations were performed, and the findings were all within normal limits. Similar cases have occurred in man and dogs, suggesting that chromosomal aberration may occur without a change in phenotypic expression and that the presence of congenital disease in dogs with chromosomal centric-fusion may be coincidental.

show abstract

Leukocyte Culture and Chromosome Preparations from Adult Dog Blood

Cited by 11 publications

References 4 publications

The Giemsa banding pattern of the canine karyotype

The Giemsa banding pattern of the canine karyotype

Cytogenetic Study of a Canine Neuroblastoma

Chromosomal abnormality in a phenotypically and clinically normal dog

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About