2005
DOI: 10.3917/res.132.0185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Les « dispositifs de confiance » dans l'espace public

Abstract: Distribution électronique Cairn.info pour Lavoisier. © Lavoisier. Tous droits réservés pour tous pays.La reproduction ou représentation de cet article, notamment par photocopie, n'est autorisée que dans les limites des conditions générales d'utilisation du site ou, le cas échéant, des conditions générales de la licence souscrite par votre établissement. Toute autre reproduction ou représentation, en tout ou partie, sous quelque forme et de quelque manière que ce soit, est interdite sauf accord préalable et écr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
14

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…The possibility of criticizing, investigating, and having a free discussion is a trust-generating mechanism (Quéré 2005). In other words, giving contractors or professionals the opportunity to express themselves is a factor that contributes to the perception of procedural fairness (Folger and Greenberg 1985;Lind and Tyler 1988).…”
Section: Discussion and Summary Regarding Harmonization Of Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The possibility of criticizing, investigating, and having a free discussion is a trust-generating mechanism (Quéré 2005). In other words, giving contractors or professionals the opportunity to express themselves is a factor that contributes to the perception of procedural fairness (Folger and Greenberg 1985;Lind and Tyler 1988).…”
Section: Discussion and Summary Regarding Harmonization Of Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, from the total number of schools that formally joined this practice, approximately 40.3 per cent depicted it in their portal, in many cases in a prominent position and it remained for a long time in the "news" section. It is known that the advertising of the institutions works as a device of trust (Queré 2005) which, in this case, means transmitting to the parents the message that the school is committed to the values of meritocracy and excellence. Through this strategy, schools attract students of those socio-economic, academic and motivational profiles that can help the school to attain a good positioning in the school rankings.…”
Section: The Practices Of Academic Distinction Planned In the Portugumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This understanding of where interests lie is congruent with the analytic checklist proposed by Warren (1999) to describe trust in institutions: citizens need to know the tasks that institutions were designed to perform, i.e., to have a "normative idea" of them; they need to know that institution members risk sanctions if they do not perform those tasks as set out; lastly, institutional transparency must be such that outside critics can criticize how institutions are functioning and thereby trigger sanctions. In Warren's schema, critics function as citizen representatives (Warren 1999: 349;Quéré 2005). 11 Predictably, critics of the FDA agree with this analysis.…”
Section: A the Publicizing Vocation Of Advisory Committeesmentioning
confidence: 99%