2021
DOI: 10.1186/s41039-021-00164-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Learning analytics of humanities course: reader profiles in critical reading activity

Abstract: This study investigates learner’s reading behaviors in a critical reading task in humanities course using learning analytics techniques. A Critical Analysis of Literature and Cinema course was selected as a context. The course activities evolved over 10 years, and for this instance, some face-to-face classroom critical reading activities were migrated to online mode by using BookRoll, a learning analytics enhanced eBook platform. Students (n=22 out of the 50 registered) accessed Hayavadana, an Indian play uplo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…"ReviseNote" and "NoteToAnnotation" behaviors illustrated that students took notes to expand their knowledge. This finding indicates that, when performing cognitive activities, students stopped at the stage of expanding knowledge and did not take for teachers (e.g., Chen & Su, 2019;Majumdar et al, 2021). Employing tracking learning data allows students to obtain personalized scaffolding to optimize the learning process when necessary in SRL (e.g., Lim et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"ReviseNote" and "NoteToAnnotation" behaviors illustrated that students took notes to expand their knowledge. This finding indicates that, when performing cognitive activities, students stopped at the stage of expanding knowledge and did not take for teachers (e.g., Chen & Su, 2019;Majumdar et al, 2021). Employing tracking learning data allows students to obtain personalized scaffolding to optimize the learning process when necessary in SRL (e.g., Lim et al, 2023).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that, 3,682,944 logs were of the target contents, but we excluded 2,867,481 logs because students’ operation was too quick (less than 3 s) or too long (longer than 20 min), which implies students’ off-task behavior on the material. The thresholds were determined by the previous studies on e-book based learning interactions (Majumdar, Bakilapadavu, et al, 2021 a, Majumdar, Flanagan, et al, 2021 b; Yin et al, 2019 ). Finally, we included 815,463 logs for our analysis (Fig.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In behavior analysis, we only targeted the completion rate of students in terms of contents. However, several other metrics can be used to gauge the learning engagement of e-book readers in general (Akçapınar et al, 2019 ) and specifically during ERT period (Majumdar, Bakilapadavu, et al, 2021 a; Majumdar, Flanagan, et al, 2021 b). In particular, the school teacher pointed out the impact of differences in the density of teaching materials in different subjects.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another aspect that interferes with the low level of metacomprehension accuracy is that teachers may use different ways of assessing students' understanding levels. Distraction level theory assumes that, when a reader assesses his or her own understanding, it is influenced by cues that originate from the reading disorder (Majumdar et al, 2021;Martins & Capellini, 2021). Based on inferential assumptions, the metacomprehension assessment was carried out based on the example of the disorder.…”
Section: Metacomprehension Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%