2016
DOI: 10.1080/02723638.2016.1200335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Latin American gentrifications

Abstract: Currently, Latin American cities are seeing simultaneous processes of reinvestment and redevelopment in their historic central areas. These are not just mega-scale interventions like Porto Maravilha in Rio or Puerto Madero in Buenos Aires or the luxury renovations seen in Santa Fe or Nueva Polanco in Mexico City, they also include state-led, piecemeal, high-rise interventions in Santiago, Buenos Aires, Rio de Janeiro, Panama and Bogota, all of which are causing the displacement of original populations and thus… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
25
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Smolka demonstrates that the multiplier effect of an administrative change in land use from rural to urban is typically more than 400 percent (2013: 6). Yet, López-Morales et al (2016) urge us to also consider less straight-cut relations between landowners and real estate developers. For Latin American cities, they attest that "[t]he systematic and unequal appropriation of ground rent by developers leaves small landowners, tenants and multioccupants at their mercy […].…”
Section: From Rural To Urban Land Grab: Some Differing Focal Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Smolka demonstrates that the multiplier effect of an administrative change in land use from rural to urban is typically more than 400 percent (2013: 6). Yet, López-Morales et al (2016) urge us to also consider less straight-cut relations between landowners and real estate developers. For Latin American cities, they attest that "[t]he systematic and unequal appropriation of ground rent by developers leaves small landowners, tenants and multioccupants at their mercy […].…”
Section: From Rural To Urban Land Grab: Some Differing Focal Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially in the Latin American context, studies on gentrification have gained ground (e.g. Ward, 1993;Jones and Varley, 1999;Janoschka et al, 2014;Schlack and Turnbull, 2014;López-Morales et al, 2016). In general, these studies show local peculiarities that do not fit the western model of gentrification.…”
Section: Investment In Property: New-built and Commercial Gentrificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; López‐Morales et al. ) was developed further by Japanese research on urban decline and regeneration. Regarding gentrification, Japanese scholars (Ajisaka and Tokuda ; Ajisaka et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical discussion regarding the appropriateness of the concept of gentrification for the non-western contexts (Lees et al 2015;López-Morales et al 2016) was developed further by Japanese research on urban decline and regeneration. Regarding gentrification, Japanese scholars (Ajisaka and Tokuda 2011;Ajisaka et al 2010Ajisaka et al , 2013Fujitsuka 2017;Takagi 1999;Tokuda et al 2009;Yabe 2003;Yagi 2015) often studied the phenomenon of reurbanization (saitoshika), also known as "urban core revival" or "return to the city centres" (toshin kaiki), after the late 1990s in singular Japanese cities, such as Kyoto, Osaka, and Tokyo, or they made comparisons between Japanese cities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, this is a boldly panoptical book that scans far and wide, building in particular on the authors' recent edited volume (2015b) and special themed issues in Urban Studies (Shin et al 2016) and Urban Geography (López-Morales et al 2016). It represents a significant act of syncretic scholarship, one that contributes and extends our understanding of the part played by gentrification in converting our cities into ever more corporatised and sanitised spaces, cleansed of the presence of the poorer classes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%